ChIPpeakAnno: annotate, visualize, and compare peak data
4 June 2025
Abstract
A guide to utilizing ChIPpeakAnno (Zhu et al. 2010; Zhu 2013) for common analysis of any genmoic interval data such as peak data collected with the classic ChIP-seq or the cutting-edge CUT&RUN experiments, ATAC-seq, and their variants. ChIPpeakAnno offers a range of functions for peak annotaion, visualization, and peak profile comparison.
Package
ChIPpeakAnno 3.43.0
1 Introduction
Several experimental techniques including ChIP-ChIP (Blat and Kleckner 1999), ChIP-seq (Barski et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2007), and CUT&RUN (Skene and Henikoff 2017) have gained widespread use in molecular biology. These techniques enable the study of protein-DNA interactions by identifying the genomic regions that are associated with specific proteins, such as transcription factor binding sites, or epigenetic markers like histone modification. Through these approaches, researchers gain valuable insights into the regulation of genes and the structure of chromatin.
The analysis involves several key procedures as outlined below, you can also integrate other omics data to gain a more comprehensive view of the gene regulation mechanisms. The steps where ChIPpeakAnno package can be utilized are displayed in pink boxes.
Figure 1: A workflow for ChIP-seq data analysis
Explanations of selected terms:
- Peak calling: identify the genomic regions of significant read enrichment (peaks), which represent the binding sites of the protein or epigenetic marker of interest
- Peak annotation: associate peaks with nearby genomic features, usually gene transcripts, to understand their functional implications
- Enrichment analysis: identify the gene ontology (GO) terms or biological pathways that are associated with the annotated genes
- Motif analysis: identify the enriched DNA patterns within peaks to understand the binding preference of the target protein
Various algorithms have been developed to identify peaks from experimental data (Thomas et al. 2017). Once the peak files are obtained, they are commonly converted into formats like BED and its variants. These formats allow the data to be easily loaded into genome browsers, such as the UCSC Genome Browser, as custom tracks. This enables investigators to examine the proximity of the peaks to different genomic features like promoters, enhancers, or other regulatory elements. However manually navigating through the genome browser can be a daunting task due to the typically large number of peaks that are spread across the genome.
The Bioconductor package ChIPpeakAnno is a pioneering tool that facilitates the batch annotation of peaks obtained from various technologies. One notable feature of ChIPpeakAnno is its ability to dynamically retrieve up-to-date annotations by leveraging the biomaRt package. This enables users to access the most current annotation files. Additionally, users can supply their own annotation data or utilize existing annotation packages. Furthermore, ChIPpeakAnno provides functions to retrieve sequences surrounding the peaks, which can be utilized for peak validation via PCR and motif discovery (Durinck et al. 2005). The package also facilitates the identification of enriched GO or pathway terms. In addition, ChIPpeakAnno includes several helper functions that aid in visualizing binding patterns and comparing peak profiles across multiple samples or experimental conditions.
ChIPpeakAnno has been continuously enhanced since its initial release in 2010, as evident from its active development1 https://github.com/jianhong/ChIPpeakAnno/blob/devel/NEWS. New features are being regularly added based on user requests. If you have any usage related questions, please search for solutions or post new questions on the Bioconductor Support Site, which is actively monitored by many seasoned users and developers. For feature request, bug report, or any other concerns, raise an issue on the ChIPpeakAnno GitHub repository. Your input and contributions will be greatly appreciated and carefully considered.
2 Quick demo
This section provides a quick example on utilizing ChIPpeakAnno to annotate peaks identified with MACS or MACS2 (Zhang et al. 2008). Several steps are typically involved and are discussed in more details in the following sections:
- Convert peaks to GRanges (Section 3)
- Handle replicates (Section 4)
- Prepare annotation file (Section 5)
- Annotate peaks (Section 7)
- Add other feature IDs (Section 8)
From Section 3 to 11, we delve into detailed use cases, showcasing the versatility of ChIPpeakAnno in various scenarios. Section 12 to 13 present several commonly employed analytical pipelines, offering step-by-step illustrations for different settings.
2.1 Convert peaks to GRanges
The ChIPpeakAnno package provides an example peak file in narrowPeak format, which is generated by MACS. To work with this example file, we need to locate it with system.file and convert it into a GRanges object using toGRanges function.
library(ChIPpeakAnno)
macs_peak <- system.file("extdata", "MACS_peaks.xls",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
macs_peak_gr <- toGRanges(macs_peak, format = "MACS")
head(macs_peak_gr, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 6 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | length summit tags
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <integer> <integer>
## X01 chr1 25323511-25324015 * | 505 252 45
## X02 chr1 25362685-25362997 * | 313 211 33
## -10*log10(pvalue) fold_enrichment FDR
## <numeric> <numeric> <numeric>
## X01 59.17 17.01 5.8
## X02 60.63 22.41 4.2
## -------
## seqinfo: 12 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths2.2 Prepare annotations
This section demonstrates how to prepare annotation file from Ensembl package. The Ensembl package is generally favored, as it offers more comprehensive and superior annotation. For more information, please refer to Section 5.
# Use Ensembl annotation package:
library(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
ensembl.hs86.transcript <- transcripts(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)2.3 Annotate peaks
# Use Ensembl annotation package:
macs_peak_ensembl <- annotatePeakInBatch(macs_peak_gr,
AnnotationData = ensembl.hs86.transcript)
head(macs_peak_ensembl, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 15 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | length summit
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <integer>
## X01.ENST00000564413 chr1 25323511-25324015 * | 505 252
## X02.ENST00000487234 chr1 25362685-25362997 * | 313 211
## tags -10*log10(pvalue) fold_enrichment FDR
## <integer> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric>
## X01.ENST00000564413 45 59.17 17.01 5.8
## X02.ENST00000487234 33 60.63 22.41 4.2
## peak feature start_position end_position
## <character> <character> <integer> <integer>
## X01.ENST00000564413 X01 ENST00000564413 25335846 25337218
## X02.ENST00000487234 X02 ENST00000487234 25342592 25351654
## feature_strand insideFeature distancetoFeature
## <character> <character> <numeric>
## X01.ENST00000564413 - downstream 13707
## X02.ENST00000487234 + downstream 20093
## shortestDistance fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <integer> <character>
## X01.ENST00000564413 11831 NearestLocation
## X02.ENST00000487234 11031 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 12 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsFor more regarding the metadata columns, please refer to the Section 7.3. Of note, the metadata does not come with “gene symbol” column. We can add it using the addGeneIDs function as below.
2.4 Add gene symbols
To add gene symbols, we can leverage either the organism annotation package, namely org.Hs.eg.db, or the bioRmart package. The latter offers the most current information but may have a slower performance as it requires querying the BioMart databases in real time. Once the required package is loaded, you can use the addGeneIDs function to add gene symbols. The following example utilizes the bioRmart method.
library(biomaRt)
mart <- useMart(biomart = "ENSEMBL_MART_ENSEMBL",
dataset = "hsapiens_gene_ensembl")
# Use Ensembl annotation package:
macs_peak_ensembl <- addGeneIDs(annotatedPeak = macs_peak_ensembl,
mart = mart,
feature_id_type = "ensembl_transcript_id",
IDs2Add = "hgnc_symbol")
head(macs_peak_ensembl, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 16 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | length summit
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <integer>
## X01.ENST00000564413 chr1 25323511-25324015 * | 505 252
## X02.ENST00000487234 chr1 25362685-25362997 * | 313 211
## tags -10*log10(pvalue) fold_enrichment FDR
## <integer> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric>
## X01.ENST00000564413 45 59.17 17.01 5.8
## X02.ENST00000487234 33 60.63 22.41 4.2
## peak feature start_position end_position
## <character> <character> <integer> <integer>
## X01.ENST00000564413 X01 ENST00000564413 25335846 25337218
## X02.ENST00000487234 X02 ENST00000487234 25342592 25351654
## feature_strand insideFeature distancetoFeature
## <character> <character> <numeric>
## X01.ENST00000564413 - downstream 13707
## X02.ENST00000487234 + downstream 20093
## shortestDistance fromOverlappingOrNearest hgnc_symbol
## <integer> <character> <character>
## X01.ENST00000564413 11831 NearestLocation RSRP1
## X02.ENST00000487234 11031 NearestLocation TMEM50A
## -------
## seqinfo: 12 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsNow, a hgnc_symbol metadata column has been successfully inserted to the resulting GRanges object. It is crucial to specify the correct feature_id_type and IDs2Add for the function to work properly. By default, feature_id_type = "ensembl_gene_id".
The following sections demonstration each topic in more details.
3 Convert peaks to GRanges
Peak files are represented as GRanges objects in ChIPpeakAnno. To facilitate the conversion of commonly used peak formats including BED (and its variants), GFF, and CSV, we have implemented a helper function called toGRanges.
# Convert GFF to GRanges:
macs_peak_gff <- system.file("extdata", "GFF_peaks_hg38.gff",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
macs_peak_gr1 <- toGRanges(macs_peak_gff, format = "GFF", header = FALSE)
head(macs_peak_gr1, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | source type score phase
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <factor> <factor> <numeric> <integer>
## [1] chr1 778513-779367 + | bed2gff NA 1 <NA>
## [2] chr1 779643-780198 + | bed2gff NA 1 <NA>
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths# Convert BED to GRanges:
macs_peak_bed <- system.file("extdata", "MACS_output_hg38.bed",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
macs_peak_gr2 <- toGRanges(macs_peak_bed, format = "BED", header = FALSE)
head(macs_peak_gr2, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## MACS_peak_1 chr1 28341-29610 * | 1
## MACS_peak_2 chr1 90821-91234 * | 1
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths4 Handle replicates
4.1 Obtain final peak set from replicates
For experiments with two or more biological replicates, there are several strategies2 https://ro-che.info/articles/2018-07-11-chip-seq-consensus to retrieve a final peak set:
- Take the intersection of peaks:
- Most conservative, reduces noise by considering the most robust and consistently enriched peaks
- May result in small number of peaks with narrower widths
- Take the union of all peaks: may lead to large number of peaks
- Least conservative, provides a more comprehensive view of the binding landscape
- Useful for identifying condition-specific or rare binding events
- Merge the overlapping peaks: may lead to peaks with broader widths
- Can be achieved with
ChIPpeakAnno::findOverlapsOfPeaks
- Can be achieved with
- Use peak coverage voting to determine a final set:
- Can be achieved with consensusSeekeR
- Statistical model based approaches that leverage peak coverage and/or read depth information
Investigators may choose one of these strategies based on their research questions and the quality of their data.
4.2 Assess the concordance of peak replicates
Concordant peaks refer to the peaks that come from different biological replicates and exhibit a high degree of overlap in their genomic coordinates and signal intensity. The presence of concordant peaks indicates that the observed signal is likely to be true positive rather than arising from random noise or technical artifacts. You can evaluate the concordance of replicates by visualizing the peak overlappings.
4.2.1 Find overlapping peaks
Here are examples demonstrating how to identify overlapping peaks using the sample peaks provided in the ChIPpeapAnno package. By default, two peaks are considered “overlapping” if “one range has its start or end strictly inside the other (maxgap = -1L)”. If you set maxgap = 1000, two peaks will be classified as “overlapping” if the number of positions that separate them is less than 1000. Additionally, specifying minoverlap = 100 ensures that only peaks with a minimum of 100 overlapping positions are treated as “overlapping”. When 0 < minoverlap < 1, the function will identify overlaps based on the percentage covered of peak interval.
# For two samples:
data(peaks1)
data(peaks2)
head(peaks1, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle>
## Site1 1 967654-967754 +
## Site2 2 2010897-2010997 +
## -------
## seqinfo: 6 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthshead(peaks2, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle>
## t1 1 967659-967869 +
## t2 2 2010898-2011108 +
## -------
## seqinfo: 6 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsol <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(peaks1, peaks2)
names(ol)## [1] "venn_cnt" "peaklist" "uniquePeaks"
## [4] "mergedPeaks" "peaksInMergedPeaks" "overlappingPeaks"
## [7] "all.peaks"# For three samples:
data(peaks3)
ol2 <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(peaks1, peaks2, peaks3,
connectedPeaks = "min")
# Find peaks with at least 90% overlap:
ol3 <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(peaks1, peaks2, minoverlap = 0.9)The results are an object of overlappingPeaks. This object provides comprehensive information about the overlappings, allowing for further visualization and interpretation:
- venn_cnt: an object of VennCounts, which can be used to draw a Venn diagram
- peaklist: a list of GRanges objects that contains all merged overlapping peaks or unique peaks
- uniquePeaks: an object of GRanges that consists of all unique peaks
- mergedPeaks: an object of GRanges that consists of all merged overlapping peaks
- peaksInMergedPeaks: an object of GRanges that consists of all peaks in each samples involved in the overlapping peaks
- overlappingPeaks: a list of data frames that consists of the annotation of all overlapping peaks
- all.peaks: a list of GRanges objects that consists the input peaks with formatted rownames
To determine the number of peaks that are unique to each peak set (i.e., not overlapping with any peaks in other set), you can use the following code:
# For peaks1:
length(ol$peaklist[["peaks1"]])## [1] 1# For peaks2:
length(ol$peaklist[["peaks2"]])## [1] 6To obtain the merged overlapping peaks, you have two options:
- You can use
ol$mergedPeaksto obtain all the merged overlapping peaks from all peak sets inol. This means that if you have multiple peak sets, this command will output all the peaks that overlap with peaks from any other peak sets - Alternatively, you can use
ol$peaklist[["peaks1///peaks2"]], where"peaks1///peaks2"represents a GRanges object that contains all the merged overlapping peaks from peaks1 and peaks2. When you only have two peak sets,ol$mergedPeaksis equivalent tool$peaklist[["peaks1///peaks2"]]. However, if more peak sets are involved, e.g. three peak sets,ol$peaklist[["peaks1///peaks2///peaks3"]]would represent merged overlapping peaks that consist of peaks from all three sets. In other words,ol$mergedPeaksis equivalent tool$peaklist[["peaks1///peaks2"]]plusol$peaklist[["peaks2///peaks3"]]andol$peaklist[["peaks1///peaks2///peaks3"]]
4.2.2 Visualize the overlaps using Venn diagram
The output from findOverlapsOfPeaks can be directly fed to makeVennDiagram to draw a Venn diagram and evaluate the degree of overlap between peak sets. Additionally, the makeVennDiagram function also calculates a P-value, which indicates whether the observed overlap is statistically significant or not.
# For two samples:
venn <- makeVennDiagram(ol, totalTest = 100,
fill = c("#009E73", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"))
Figure 2: Venn diagram showing the number of overlapping peaks for two samples
# For three samples:
venn2 <- makeVennDiagram(ol2, totalTest = 100,
fill = c("#CC79A7", "#56B4E9", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"))
Figure 3: Venn diagram showing the number of overlapping peaks for two samples
# For peaks overlap at least 90%:
venn3 <- makeVennDiagram(ol3, totalTest = 100,
fill = c("#009E73", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"))
Figure 4: Venn diagram showing the number of overlapping peaks for two samples
The parameter totalTest refers to the total number of potential peaks that are considered in the hypergeometric test. It should be set to a value larger than the largest number of peaks in the replicates. Refer to Section 11.1 on how to choose totalTest. Since P-value is sensitive to the choice of totalTest, we recommend using permutation test, implemented as peakPermTest in Biocpkg("ChIPpeakAnno"). For details, go to Section 11.2.
4.2.3 Use other tools to plot Venn diagram
Users can leverage the ol$venn_cnt object and choose other tools to draw Venn diagram. Below illustrates how to use Vennerable library for plotting.
if (!library(Vennerable)) {
install.packages("Vennerable", repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org")
library(Vennerable)
}
n <- which(colnames(ol$vennCounts) == "Counts") - 1
set_names <- colnames(ol$vennCounts)[1:n]
weight <- ol$vennCounts[, "Counts"]
names(weight) <- apply(ol$vennCounts[, 1:n], 1, base::paste, collapse = "")
v <- Venn(SetNames = set_names, Weight = weight)
plot(v)4.2.4 Visualize the distribution of relative positions for overlapping peaks
As mentioned earlier, two peaks are considered as “overlapping” if their distances are within maxgap. To visualize the distribution of the relative positions of peaks1 to peaks2, we can create a pie chart using the ol$overlappingPeaks object. This object contains detailed information about the relative positions of peaks for each pair of peak sets. For instance, ol$overlappingPeaks[["peaks1\\\peaks2"]] represents the relative positions of overlapping peaks between peaks1 and peaks2.
names(ol$overlappingPeaks)## [1] "peaks1///peaks2"dim(ol$overlappingPeaks[["peaks1///peaks2"]])## [1] 12 14ol$overlappingPeaks[["peaks1///peaks2"]][1:2, ]## peaks1 seqnames start end width strand peaks2 seqnames start
## Site1_t1 Site1 1 967654 967754 101 + t1 1 967659
## Site2_t2 Site2 2 2010897 2010997 101 + t2 2 2010898
## end width strand overlapFeature shortestDistance
## Site1_t1 967869 211 + overlapStart 5
## Site2_t2 2011108 211 + overlapStart 1unique(ol$overlappingPeaks[["peaks1///peaks2"]][["overlapFeature"]])## [1] "overlapStart" "inside" "overlapEnd" "includeFeature"pie1(table(ol$overlappingPeaks[["peaks1///peaks2"]]$overlapFeature))
The column overlapFeature describes the relative positions of peaks between peaks1 and peaks2:
- upstream: the peak from peaks1 is located upstream of the peak from peaks2 and is within a distance of
maxgap - downstream: the peak from peaks1 is located downstream of the peak from peaks2 and is within a distance of
maxgap - overlapStart: the peak from peaks1 overlaps with the start of peak from peaks2
- overlapEnd: the peak from peaks1 overlaps with the end of peak from peaks2
- inside: the peak from peaks1 is completely contained within the peak from peaks2
- includeFeature: the peak from peaks1 contains the entire range of the peak from peaks2. Note that the term Feature here refers to the peak in peaks2 rather than a genomic feature as used in peak annotation context
The utilization of a Venn diagram, in conjunction with a pie chart, enables a more comprehensive evaluation of peak concordance among biological replicates.
5 Prepare annotation file
An annotation file contains genomic coordinates and other relevant information for various genomic features, such as genes, transcripts, promoters, enhancers, and more. By comparing the peaks with these coordinates, researchers can determine which features are most enriched or associated with the peaks, which can help them understand the functional relevance of the peaks and provide insights into the potential regulatory elements or genes involved.
5.1 Commonly used annotations
Popular annotation files come from two sources and are typically stored in tab-delimited formats, such as GTF or BED.
| Resource | Generated_by | Annotation_criteria | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensembl | EMBL-EBI | Comprehensive (most transcripts) | https://ftp.Ensembl.org/pub/ |
| NCBI RefSeq | NCBI | Conservative (fewer transcripts) | https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/ |
In addition, the UCSC Genome Browser team provides processed annotations based on the above resources that can be visualized easily with the browser. For human and mouse, there are four GTF files provided respectively.
| Human | Mouse | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| hg38.refGene.gtf.gz | mm10.refGene.gtf.gz | Based on RefSeq transcripts aligned by UCSC followed by manual curation |
| hg38.ncbiRefSeq.gtf.gz | mm10.ncbiRefSeq.gtf.gz | Based on RefSeq transcripts as aligned by NCBI |
| hg38.knownGene.gtf.gz | mm10.knownGene.gtf.gz | Based on Ensembl gene models |
We would recommend using EnsDb annotations because they are usually more comprehensive and consistent.
5.2 Bioconductor supported TxDb and EnsDb
In Bioconductor, the tab-delimited files are often converted into TxDb or EnsDb object. Both can be created with the tab delimited files mentioned above. While EnsDb is tailored to Ensembl annotations and contains additional information such as gene_name, symbol, and gene_biotype, the TxDb counterpart is typically created from RefSeq or UCSC Genome Browser hosted annotations.
There is a comprehensive list of pre-built Bioconductor maintained TxDb and EnsDb packages such as TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene and EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86. The list is regularly updated and can be found here.
5.3 Obtain EnsDb and TxDb from AnnotationHub
Users can also retrieve annotations using the AnnotationHub package. By default, AnnotationHub uses a snapshot that matches the version of Bioconductor being used, so it may be slightly more up-to-date compared to the pre-built packages. Additionally, users have the option to switch to an earlier version3 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/AnnotationHub/inst/doc/AnnotationHub.html#configuring-annotationhub-objects. Below are examples of how to obtain annotations using AnnotationHub.
library(AnnotationHub)
ah <- AnnotationHub()
# Obtain EnsDb:
EnsDb_Mmusculus_all <- query(ah, pattern = c("Mus musculus", "EnsDb"))
head(EnsDb_Mmusculus_all, n = 2)## AnnotationHub with 2 records
## # snapshotDate(): 2025-06-03
## # $dataprovider: Ensembl
## # $species: Mus musculus
## # $rdataclass: EnsDb
## # additional mcols(): taxonomyid, genome, description,
## # coordinate_1_based, maintainer, rdatadateadded, preparerclass, tags,
## # rdatapath, sourceurl, sourcetype
## # retrieve records with, e.g., 'object[["AH53222"]]'
##
## title
## AH53222 | Ensembl 87 EnsDb for Mus Musculus
## AH53726 | Ensembl 88 EnsDb for Mus MusculusEnsDb_Mmusculus <- EnsDb_Mmusculus_all[["AH53222"]]
class(EnsDb_Mmusculus)## [1] "EnsDb"
## attr(,"package")
## [1] "ensembldb"# Obtain TxDb:
TxDb_Mmusculus_all <- query(ah, pattern = c("Mus musculus", "TxDb"))
head(TxDb_Mmusculus_all, n = 2)## AnnotationHub with 2 records
## # snapshotDate(): 2025-06-03
## # $dataprovider: UCSC
## # $species: Mus musculus
## # $rdataclass: TxDb
## # additional mcols(): taxonomyid, genome, description,
## # coordinate_1_based, maintainer, rdatadateadded, preparerclass, tags,
## # rdatapath, sourceurl, sourcetype
## # retrieve records with, e.g., 'object[["AH52263"]]'
##
## title
## AH52263 | TxDb.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10.ensGene.sqlite
## AH52264 | TxDb.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10.knownGene.sqliteTxDb_Mmusculus <- TxDb_Mmusculus_all[["AH52264"]]
class(TxDb_Mmusculus)## [1] "TxDb"
## attr(,"package")
## [1] "GenomicFeatures"5.4 Build custom EnsDb and TxDb
To create the most up-to-date or custom TxDb and EnsDb objects, you can utilize functions such as makeTxDbFromUCSC, makeTxDbFromEnsembl, and ensDbFromGRanges from the GenomicFeatures4 https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/GenomicFeatures/inst/doc/GenomicFeatures.html package and the Ensembldb5 https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/Ensembldb/inst/doc/Ensembldb.html#102_Building_annotation_packages package.
5.5 Use biomaRt
The biomaRt package offers a convenient interface to the BioMart databases that are prominently maintained by Ensembl. By querying biomaRt, you can access the latest available annotations from Ensembl. Check this vignette for details.
ChIPpeakAnno provides a helper function called getAnnotation, which simplifies the retrieval of desired annotations by leveraging biomaRt. Here is an example:
library(biomaRt)
listMarts()
head(listDatasets(useMart("ENSEMBL_MART_ENSEMBL")), n = 2)
mart <- useMart(biomart = "ENSEMBL_MART_ENSEMBL",
dataset = "mmusculus_gene_ensembl")
anno_from_biomart <- getAnnotation(mart,
featureType = "transcript")
head(anno_from_biomart, n = 2)5.5.1 Convert annotations into GRanges
To annotate peaks, the chosen annotation file needs to be converted into GRanges class first. This can be achieved with toGRanges function, accessor functions, or getAnnotation function.
5.6 Use toGRanges function
ChIPpeakAnno offers a helper function called toGRanges, which can convert annotations from various formats including GFF, BED, CSV, TxDb, and EnsDb into GRanges. Below is an example.
library(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
anno_ensdb_transcript <- toGRanges(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86,
feature = "transcript")
head(anno_ensdb_transcript, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 3 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | tx_id gene_id
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character>
## ENST00000456328 chr1 11869-14409 + | ENST00000456328 ENSG00000223972
## ENST00000450305 chr1 12010-13670 + | ENST00000450305 ENSG00000223972
## gene_name
## <character>
## ENST00000456328 DDX11L1
## ENST00000450305 DDX11L1
## -------
## seqinfo: 357 sequences (1 circular) from 2 genomes (hg38, GRCh38)Similarly, set feature = "gene" to retrieve gene annotations in GRanges format.
5.6.1 Use accessor functions
If you are working with TxDb or EnsDb objects, you can obtain annotations in GRanges format with various accessor functions such as genes and transcripts, which are designed for easy fetching of the desired information.
anno_ensdb_transcript <- transcripts(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
head(anno_ensdb_transcript, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 6 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | tx_id
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character>
## ENST00000456328 1 11869-14409 + | ENST00000456328
## ENST00000450305 1 12010-13670 + | ENST00000450305
## tx_biotype tx_cds_seq_start tx_cds_seq_end
## <character> <integer> <integer>
## ENST00000456328 processed_transcript <NA> <NA>
## ENST00000450305 transcribed_unproces.. <NA> <NA>
## gene_id tx_name
## <character> <character>
## ENST00000456328 ENSG00000223972 ENST00000456328
## ENST00000450305 ENSG00000223972 ENST00000450305
## -------
## seqinfo: 357 sequences (1 circular) from GRCh38 genome5.6.2 Use getAnnotation function
The output from getAnnotation function is in GRanges format, refer to Section 5.5 for details.
6 Visualize peak distributions
Plotting peak distributions is a valuable quality control measure as it provides an overview of the localization of peaks across the genome. Unexpected distributions can indicate potential issues with the data. In addition, you can select appropriate annotation file depending on the distribution of your peaks. For instance, if peaks are enriched near promoters, you may focus on annotating them with nearby transcripts.
6.1 Plot peak distributions relative to genomic features
The binOverFeature function can be used to plot the distribution of peak counts relative to a specific genomic feature. The following example shows the distribution of peaks in the macs_peak_gr2 dataset relative to the gene feature (transcription start site (TSS)).
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
annotation_data <- transcripts(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
binOverFeature(macs_peak_gr2,
featureSite = "FeatureStart",
nbins = 20,
annotationData = annotation_data,
xlab = "peak distance from TSS (bp)",
ylab = "peak count",
main = "Distribution of aggregated peak numbers around TSS")
Figure 5: Peak count distribution around TSSs
By default, featureSite = "FeatureStart" meaning that distance is calculated as peak to feature start (i.e. TSS for transcript). The plot above, describing the distribution of peaks around TSS, exhibits a signal summit around TSS, a characteristic pattern observed in peaks obtained from transcription factor binding experiments.
You can also plot peak distribution over multiple genomic features including exon, intron, enhancer, proximal promoter, 5’ UTR and 3’ UTR in a single bar graph using assignChromosomeRegion.
chromosome_region <- assignChromosomeRegion(macs_peak_gr2,
TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene,
nucleotideLevel = FALSE,
precedence=c("Promoters",
"immediateDownstream",
"fiveUTRs",
"threeUTRs",
"Exons",
"Introns"))
# optional helper function to rotate x-axis labels for barplot():
# ref: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10286473/rotating-x-axis-labels-in-r-for-barplot
rotate_x <- function(data, rot_angle) {
plt <- barplot(data, xaxt = "n")
text(plt, par("usr")[3],
labels = names(data),
srt = rot_angle, adj = c(1.1,1.1),
xpd = TRUE, cex = 0.6)
}
rotate_x(chromosome_region[["percentage"]], 45)
Figure 6: Bar graph showing peak distributions over different genomic features
By default, nucleotideLevel = FALSE meaning that peaks are treated as ranges when determining overlaps with genomic features. If a peak intersects with multiple features, the feature assignment is determined by the order specified in the precedence argument. If precedence is not set, counts for each overlapping feature will be incremented. Otherwise, if nucleotideLevel = TRUE, the summit of the peak (a single position, not suitable for broad peaks) will be used when determining overlaps.
6.2 Plot peak distributions over different feature levels
In addition to inspecting the peak enrichment pattern by plotting the distribution against genomic features, users can plot distributions over different feature levels, each containing multiple categories, using the genomicElementDistribution function.
- Transcript Level: “geneLevel”
- “Promoter”
- “Gene body”
- “Downstream”
- “Distal Intergenic”
- Exon Level: “Exons”
- “5’ UTR”
- “CDS”
- “3’ URT”
- “Other exon”
- Exon/Intron/Intergenic: “ExonIntron”
- “Exon”
- “Intron”
- “Intergenic”
Please note that peaks can be classified into multiple categories from different levels, leading to the total percentage of annotated features being greater than 100%. At each level, since a peak spans a genomic range, it may overlap with multiple categories of features. In such cases, by default nucleotideLevel = FALSE, which means that the precedence is determined by the order listed in the labels argument.
The genomicElementDistribution function accepts either a single peak object or a list of peak objects as input. If a single peak object if provided, a pie chart will be created; if a list of peak objects is provided, a bar graph will be created.
6.2.1 Pie graph with one peak set
genomicElementDistribution(macs_peak_gr1,
TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
Figure 7: Pie graph showing peak distributions over features at different levels
As can be seen, a significant number of peaks originate from promoter regions.
6.2.2 Bar graph with a list of peak sets
macs_peaks <- GRangesList(rep1 = macs_peak_gr1,
rep2 = macs_peak_gr2)
genomicElementDistribution(macs_peaks,
TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
Figure 8: Bar graph showing peak distributions over features at different levels
The consistent patterns from “rep1” and “rep2” indicate a high correlation between them.
6.3 Plot peak overlaps for multiple features
We can create an UpSet plot to view peak overlaps across multiple genomic features.
library(UpSetR)
res <- genomicElementUpSetR(macs_peak_gr1,
TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
upset(res[["plotData"]],
nsets = length(colnames(res$plotData)),
nintersects = NA)
Figure 9: UpSet plot showing the overlappings of peak distributions among different genomic features
UpSet plot can be considered as a “high dimensional Venn diagram” that allows for the visualization of overlaps for multiple sets. For example, in the above plot, it is evident that the feature set “gene body” (from the “Transcript Level”) and the feature set “intron” (from the “Exon/Intron/Intergenic”) share the highest number of common peaks. Type ?genomicElementUpSetR for the definition of distal_promoter.
7 Annotate peaks
With the annotation data, you can assign the peaks identified in your experiments to nearby features of your choice such as genes and transcripts. This process is known as peak annotation. The annotatePeakInBatch function offers a highly flexible approach to perform peak annotation with various output option.
For example, you can annotate peaks based on their nearest (output = "nearestLocation") or overlapping (output = "overlapping") features using the peak-centric method. Alternatively, you can annotate peaks based on their relative locations to features using the feature-centric method. For example, if a peak is located upstream of a gene within a certain distance (e.g. promoter region), you can assign that gene to the peak (output = "upstream"). The bindingRegion option allows for even more flexibility in specifying teh relative locations. Detailed explanations see below.
The choice between the peak-centric and feature-centric methods depends on your research question, although most users initially opt for the peak-centric approach as it is easier to interpret.
7.1 Peak-centric method
You can assign the nearest or overlapping features to your peaks by setting the output option to the following values:
- output: criteria for assigning features
- “nearestLocation”: (default) output the features that are nearest to the peaks based on the absolute value of the difference between the peak location and the feature location, as calculated by
abs(PeakLocForDistance - FeatureLocForDistance) - “overlapping”: output features that overlap with the peaks within the maximum distance specified by the
maxgapparameter - “both”: output both the nearest feature and overlapping features that are not the nearest
- “shortestDistance”: output the features that have the shortest distance to the peaks; the “shortest distance” is determined from either end of the feature to either end of the peak
- “nearestLocation”: (default) output the features that are nearest to the peaks based on the absolute value of the difference between the peak location and the feature location, as calculated by
Other relevant parameters:
- PeakLocForDistance: location of the peak for distance calculation
- “middle”: (recommended) use the center of the peak
- “start”: (default) use the peak edge that is smaller in coordinate
- “end”: use the peak edge that is larger in coordinate
- “endMinusStart”: use “end” defined above if feature is on the plus strand, and “start” if minus strand
- FeatureLocForDistance: location of the feature for distance calculation
- “middle”: use the center of the feature
- “start”: use the feature edge that is smaller in coordinate
- “end”: use the feature edge that is large in coordinate
- “TSS”: (default) use “start” defined above if feature is on the plus strand and “end” if on the minus strand
- “geneEnd”: use “end” defined above if feature is on the plus strand and “start” if on the minus strand
- maxgap: the maximum gap that is allowed between the peak and the feature ranges for them to be considered as overlapping; it is defined as the number of bases that separates the two ranges, the gap between two adjacent ranges is 0
output = "nearestLocation", the distance between the peak and the feature is calculated as abs(PeakLocForDistance - FeatureLocForDistance); for demonstration, PeakLocForDistance = "start" and FeatureLocForDistance = "TSS".
Figure 10: How does peak-centric annotation method work
7.2 Feature-centric method
Peaks can also be annotated based on their relative locations to nearby features. For example, by setting output = "upstream", peaks will be annotated to features that they are located upstream of.
7.2.1 Relative peak-to-feature location
You can use the following options to specify the desired relative locations of the peaks to the features.
- output: criteria for assigning features
- “upstream”: output the feature if the peak resides upstream of it
- “upstrem&inside”: output the feature if the peak resides upstream of it or contained within it
- “inside”: output the feature if the peak is completely contained within it
- “inside&downstream”: output the feature if the peak resides within it or downstream of it
- “downstream”: output the feature if the peak resides downstream of it
- “upstreamORdownstream”: output the feature if the peak resides upstream or downstream of it
Other relevant parameter:
- maxgap: allowed gap when determining overlap between two ranges; will be ignored if
output = "inside"
The following diagram illustrates how peaks are annotated using the feature-centric method.
Figure 11: How does feature-centric annotation method work
When using the feature-centric method, the annotatePeakInBatch function will output the feature as long as the peak range overlaps with the target region, except when output = "inside". In this case, the entire peak range must be completely contained within the feature range to output it.
7.2.2 More customization with bindingRegion
The bindingRegion parameter, which refers to the regions that the target TF binds to, adds further flexibility to the feature-centric method when defining the target region. For example, if you would like to annotate peaks to features where the peaks are located within specific regions relative to them, such as from 2000bp upstream to 500bp downstream of TSS (where most promoters are found), you can set output = "overlapping", FeatureLocForDistance = "TSS", and bindingRegion = c(-2000, 500). Once bindingRegion is specified, the maxgap will be ignored.
The following diagram demonstrates several examples of how to use bindingRegion to define target regions.
Figure 12: How to define target region with bindingRegion
Bi-directional promoters are genomic regions that are located upstream of the TSS of two adjacent genes that are transcribed in opposite directions (Adachi and Lieber 2002). Those promoters typically regulate the expression of both genes. To annotate peaks located in such regions, you can use output = "overlapping", FeatureLocForDistance = "TSS", and bindingRegion = c(-5000, 3000). By default, select = "all", meaning that all overlapping features will be outputted. If you want to annotate peaks to features with the nearest bi-directional promoters, you can use output = "nearestBiDirectionalPromoters" along with bindingRegion. In this setting, at most one feature will be reported from each direction. When using output = "nearestBiDirectionalPromoters", both maxgap and FeatureLocForDistance will be ignored.
To illustrate, we can use the myPeakList provided by ChIPpeakAnno. As different major genome releases (e.g. hg19 vs hg38) may have variations in feature coordinates, it is highly recommended to use an annotation file that matches the genome version used when generating your peak file. In the case of myPeakList, the peaks were originally called against hg18, so it is necessary to use a matching annotation file created with hg18. Alternatively, you can use the rtracklayer::liftOver() function to convert myPeakList to hg38 coordinates. For step-by-step instructions, refer to “Step3” in Section 11.2.1.
7.3 Example 1: find the nearest features
We can annotate the peaks by assigning the nearby features to them. This can be achieved by setting output = "nearestLocation". When this option is used, the results may include “overlapping” features as long as they are the nearest ones to the peaks.
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg18.knownGene)
data(myPeakList)
peak_to_anno <- myPeakList[1:100]
anno_data <- transcripts(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg18.knownGene)
annotated_peak <- annotatePeakInBatch(peak_to_anno,
output = "nearestLocation",
PeakLocForDistance = "start",
FeatureLocForDistance = "TSS",
AnnotationData = anno_data)
head(annotated_peak, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peak feature
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 chr1 556660-556760 * | X1_93_556427 ann16
## X1_41_559455.ann19 chr1 559774-559874 * | X1_41_559455 ann19
## start_position end_position feature_strand insideFeature
## <integer> <integer> <character> <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 556325 557910 + inside
## X1_41_559455.ann19 559396 560212 + inside
## distancetoFeature shortestDistance
## <numeric> <integer>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 335 335
## X1_41_559455.ann19 378 338
## fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 NearestLocation
## X1_41_559455.ann19 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 24 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsHere is a breakdown of the options:
output = "nearestLocation": (default)- output the nearest features calculated as
abs(PeakLocForDistance - FeatureLocForDistance). The output can consist of both “strictly nearest features (non-overlapping)” and “overlapping features” as long as it is the nearest
- output the nearest features calculated as
PeakLocForDistance = "start"(default):- “start” means using the 5’ end (relative to plus strand) of the peak to calculate the distance to features
FeatureLocForDistance = "TSS"(default):- “TSS” means using the 5’ end (relative to plus strand) for features on the plus strand and use the 3’ end (also relative to plus strand) for features on the minus strand to calculate the distance to features
Here is a breakdown of the resulting metadata columns:
- peak: id of the peak
- feature: id of the feature such as Ensembl gene ID
- start_position, end_position, feature_strand: feature coordinates
- insideFeature: relative location of the peak to the feature
- “upstream”: peak resides upstream of the feature
- “downstream”: peak resides downstream of the feature
- “inside”: peak resides inside the feature
- “overlapStart”: peak overlaps with the start of the feature
- “overlapEnd”: peak overlaps with the end of the feature
- “includeFeature”: peak includes the feature entirely
- distancetoFeature: peak-to-feature distance as calculated with
abs(PeakLocForDistance - FeatureLocForDistance) - shortestDistance: the shortest distance from either end of the peak to either end the feature
- fromOverlappingOrNearest: relevant only when
output = "both"; “nearestLocation” indicates that the feature is the closest to the peak, can overlap with the peak; “Overlapping” means that the feature overlaps with the peak and it is not the nearest; whenoutput = "nearestLocation", this column should consist of only “NearestLocation”
7.4 Example 2: find the nearest and overlapping features
In addition, annotatePeakInBatch can also report both the nearest features and overlapping features by setting output = "both" and the maxgap parameter. For example, the following command outputs the nearest features plus all overlapping features that are within 100bp away.
annotated_peak <- annotatePeakInBatch(peak_to_anno,
AnnotationData = anno_data,
output = "both",
maxgap = 100)
head(annotated_peak, n = 4)## GRanges object with 4 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peak feature
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 chr1 556660-556760 * | X1_93_556427 ann16
## X1_93_556427.ann3352 chr1 556660-556760 * | X1_93_556427 ann3352
## X1_41_559455.ann19 chr1 559774-559874 * | X1_41_559455 ann19
## X1_41_559455.ann3352 chr1 559774-559874 * | X1_41_559455 ann3352
## start_position end_position feature_strand insideFeature
## <integer> <integer> <character> <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 556325 557910 + inside
## X1_93_556427.ann3352 79158 735413 - inside
## X1_41_559455.ann19 559396 560212 + inside
## X1_41_559455.ann3352 79158 735413 - inside
## distancetoFeature shortestDistance
## <numeric> <integer>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 335 335
## X1_93_556427.ann3352 178753 178653
## X1_41_559455.ann19 378 338
## X1_41_559455.ann3352 175639 175539
## fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <character>
## X1_93_556427.ann16 NearestLocation
## X1_93_556427.ann3352 Overlapping
## X1_41_559455.ann19 NearestLocation
## X1_41_559455.ann3352 Overlapping
## -------
## seqinfo: 24 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsNow, the fromOverlappingOrNearest column consists of both “NearestLocation” and “Overlapping” categories.
7.5 Visualize peak-to-feature distances
The relative location distribution of peak-to-feature can be visualized using the information stored in the insideFeature metadata column.
pie1(table(annotated_peak$insideFeature))
Figure 13: Peak distribution around features
7.6 Use custom annotation data
You also have the option to create and pass user-defined feature coordinates in GRanges format as annotationData. For example, if you have a list of transcript factor binding sites obtained by literature mining and would like to use it to annotate your peaks. you can convert the TF binding site coordinates into a GRanges object and then pass that object into annotatePeakInBatch.
TF_binding_sites <- GRanges(seqnames = c("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "1",
"2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "6", "6",
"6", "6", "5"),
ranges = IRanges(start = c(967659, 2010898, 2496700,
3075866, 3123260, 3857500,
96765, 201089, 249670,
307586, 312326, 385750,
1549800, 1554400, 1565000,
1569400, 167888600),
end = c(967869, 2011108, 2496920,
3076166,3123470, 3857780,
96985, 201299, 249890, 307796,
312586, 385960, 1550599,
1560799, 1565399, 1571199,
167888999),
names = paste("t", 1:17, sep = "")),
strand = c("*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*",
"*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*", "*"))
annotated_peak2 <- annotatePeakInBatch(peaks1, AnnotationData = TF_binding_sites)
head(annotated_peak2, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peak feature
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character>
## Site1.t1 1 967654-967754 + | Site1 t1
## Site2.t2 2 2010897-2010997 + | Site2 t2
## start_position end_position feature_strand insideFeature
## <integer> <integer> <character> <character>
## Site1.t1 967659 967869 * overlapStart
## Site2.t2 2010898 2011108 * overlapStart
## distancetoFeature shortestDistance fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <numeric> <integer> <character>
## Site1.t1 -5 5 NearestLocation
## Site2.t2 -1 1 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 6 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsAnother example of using user-defined AnnotationData is to annotate peaks by promoters. A promoter is typically defined as the DNA sequence located immediately upstream of the TSS of a gene. The specific size of a promoter can vary depending on the gene, its regulatory complexity, and the species being studied. In practice, the promoter region can be defined as 2000bp upstream and 500bp downstream from the TSS. To prepare a custom annotation file containing only promoters, users can leverage the accessor function promoters. Similar results can be obtained using the feature-centric approach mentioned in Section 7.2.
promoter_regions <- promoters(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg18.knownGene,
upstream = 2000, downstream = 500)
head(promoter_regions, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 2 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | tx_id tx_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <character>
## uc001aaa.2 chr1 -884-1615 + | 1 uc001aaa.2
## uc009vip.1 chr1 -884-1615 + | 2 uc009vip.1
## -------
## seqinfo: 49 sequences (1 circular) from hg18 genomeannotated_peak3 <- annotatePeakInBatch(peak_to_anno,
AnnotationData = promoter_regions)
head(annotated_peak3, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peak
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character>
## X1_93_556427.uc001abb.1 chr1 556660-556760 * | X1_93_556427
## X1_41_559455.uc001abc.1 chr1 559774-559874 * | X1_41_559455
## feature start_position end_position
## <character> <integer> <integer>
## X1_93_556427.uc001abb.1 uc001abb.1 556707 559206
## X1_41_559455.uc001abc.1 uc001abc.1 557396 559895
## feature_strand insideFeature distancetoFeature
## <character> <character> <numeric>
## X1_93_556427.uc001abb.1 + overlapStart -47
## X1_41_559455.uc001abc.1 + inside 2378
## shortestDistance fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <integer> <character>
## X1_93_556427.uc001abb.1 47 NearestLocation
## X1_41_559455.uc001abc.1 21 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 24 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths8 Add other feature IDs
Depending on the annotation file you use, the feature assigned to your peaks may have different feature IDs. For example, if you annotate your peaks with genes using the TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene annotation file, the feature id provided in the annotation file will be “entrez ID”. On the other hand, if you annotate your peaks using the EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86 annotation file, the feature id in the annotation will be “Ensembl gene ID”.
anno_txdb <- genes(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
head(anno_txdb$gene_id, n = 5)## [1] "1" "10" "100" "1000" "100008586"anno_ensdb <- genes(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
head(anno_ensdb$gene_id, n = 5)## [1] "ENSG00000223972" "ENSG00000227232" "ENSG00000278267" "ENSG00000243485"
## [5] "ENSG00000237613"The feature id in the annotation file will be listed under the “feature” metadata column in your annotated peak GRanges object. To link these feature IDs to other IDs such as “symbol”, you can use the addGeneIDs function.
The addGeneIDs function can accept either a vector of feature IDs or an annotated peak GRanges object as input. It works by creating a mapping between the input feature IDs and the IDs to be linked, using either an organism annotation dataset (OrgDb object, such as org.Hs.eg.db) or a BioMart dataset (Mart object, such as useMart(biomart = "Ensembl", dataset = "hsapiens_gene_Ensembl")).
To use the function correctly, you need to provide the input feature ID type using the feature_id_type argument, and specify the feature ID types that need to be linked via the IDs2Add argument. The supported feature_id_type and IDs2Add differ between OrgDb and Mart. Below summarizes the commonly used ID types.
- Use OrgDb
- feature_id_type: input feature ID type
- “ensembl_gene_id”
- “entrez_id”
- “gene_symbol”
- “gene_alias”
- “refseq_id”
- IDs2Add: features ID types to be linked
- “ensembl”
- “ensembltrans”
- “ensemblprot”
- “entrez_id”
- “refseq”
- “symbol”
- feature_id_type: input feature ID type
- Use Mart
- feature_id_type: input feature ID type, use
listFilters(mart)to see the full list- “ensembl_gene_id”
- “ensembl_transcript_id”
- “ensembl_exon_id”
- “external_gene_name”
- “entrezgene_id”
- IDs2Add: feature ID types to be linked, use
listAttributes(mart)to see the full list- “ensembl_gene_id”
- “ensembl_transcript_id”
- “ensembl_exon_id”
- “gene_biotype”
- “transcript_biotype”
- “entrezgene_id”
- “hgnc_symbol”
- “entrezgene_trans_name”
- feature_id_type: input feature ID type, use
8.1 Example1: find gene symbols for a vector of entrez IDs
The following example demonstrates how to use the addGeneIDs function to find gene symbols for a vector of entrez IDs using OrgDb. Note that the "org.Hs.eg.db" package name must be quoted.
library(org.Hs.eg.db)
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
ucsc.hg38.knownGene <- genes(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
entrez_ids <- head(ucsc.hg38.knownGene$gene_id, n = 10)
print(entrez_ids)## [1] "1" "10" "100" "1000" "100008586" "100008587"
## [7] "100009613" "100009667" "100009676" "10001"res <- addGeneIDs(entrez_ids,
orgAnn = "org.Hs.eg.db",
feature_id_type = "entrez_id",
IDs2Add = "symbol")
head(res, n = 3)## entrez_id symbol
## 1 1 A1BG
## 2 10 NAT2
## 3 100 ADA8.2 Example2: add gene symbols to annotated peaks
For this example, we annotate the macs_peak_gr2 (obtained in Section 3) using transcript information from TxDb, and add gene symbols to them.
txdb.hg38.transcript <- transcripts(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
head(txdb.hg38.transcript, n = 4)## GRanges object with 4 ranges and 2 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | tx_id tx_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <character>
## [1] chr1 11121-14413 + | 1 ENST00000832824.1
## [2] chr1 11125-14405 + | 2 ENST00000832825.1
## [3] chr1 11410-14413 + | 3 ENST00000832826.1
## [4] chr1 11411-14413 + | 4 ENST00000832827.1
## -------
## seqinfo: 711 sequences (1 circular) from hg38 genomehead(names(txdb.hg38.transcript), n = 4)## NULLIt appears that the txdb.hg38.transcript contains a metadata column called tx_name, which holds the Ensembl transcript IDs. However, the annotatePeakInBatch function requires this information to be stored as the names of the txdb.hg38.trancsript object (names(txdb.hg38.transcript)). This is necessary to generate annotated peaks that are compatible with the addGeneIDs function. To achieve this, we need to extract the transcript IDs and assign them as names. Below is how.
tr_id <- txdb.hg38.transcript$tx_name
tr_id <- sub("\\..*$", "", tr_id) # get rid of the trailing version number
names(txdb.hg38.transcript) <- tr_id
head(txdb.hg38.transcript, n = 4)## GRanges object with 4 ranges and 2 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | tx_id tx_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <character>
## ENST00000832824 chr1 11121-14413 + | 1 ENST00000832824.1
## ENST00000832825 chr1 11125-14405 + | 2 ENST00000832825.1
## ENST00000832826 chr1 11410-14413 + | 3 ENST00000832826.1
## ENST00000832827 chr1 11411-14413 + | 4 ENST00000832827.1
## -------
## seqinfo: 711 sequences (1 circular) from hg38 genomeNow, we can annotate macs_peak_gr2 with annotatePeakInBatch.
res <- annotatePeakInBatch(macs_peak_gr2,
AnnotationData = txdb.hg38.transcript)
head(res, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 10 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 chr1 28341-29610 * | 1
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 chr1 90821-91234 * | 1
## peak feature start_position
## <character> <character> <integer>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 MACS_peak_1 ENST00000834619 28589
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 MACS_peak_2 ENST00000495576 89551
## end_position feature_strand insideFeature
## <integer> <character> <character>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 29345 + includeFeature
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 91105 - overlapStart
## distancetoFeature shortestDistance
## <numeric> <integer>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 -248 248
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 284 129
## fromOverlappingOrNearest
## <character>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 NearestLocation
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsAs anticipated, the resulting feature column contains Ensembl transcript IDs. Next, we utilize the mart option to add gene symbols.
library(biomaRt)
mart <- useMart(biomart = "ENSEMBL_MART_ENSEMBL",
dataset = "hsapiens_gene_ensembl")
res <- addGeneIDs(res,
mart = mart,
feature_id_type = "ensembl_transcript_id",
IDs2Add = "hgnc_symbol")
head(res, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 11 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 chr1 28341-29610 * | 1
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 chr1 90821-91234 * | 1
## peak feature start_position
## <character> <character> <integer>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 MACS_peak_1 ENST00000834619 28589
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 MACS_peak_2 ENST00000495576 89551
## end_position feature_strand insideFeature
## <integer> <character> <character>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 29345 + includeFeature
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 91105 - overlapStart
## distancetoFeature shortestDistance
## <numeric> <integer>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 -248 248
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 284 129
## fromOverlappingOrNearest hgnc_symbol
## <character> <character>
## MACS_peak_1.ENST00000834619 NearestLocation MIR1302-2HG
## MACS_peak_2.ENST00000495576 NearestLocation
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsUse listMarts to show available biomart and use listDatasets to show available dataset. Be aware that, unlike using OrgDb option, we must supply hgnc_symbol instead of symbol for the IDs2Add argument.
9 Enrichment analysis
Enrichment analysis is a crucial step in determining whether specific biological processes, pathways, or functional categories are over-represented among the genes associated with the peaks. This analysis provides functional implications for the annotated peaks. Two commonly used method for enrichment analysis are gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment.
The GO is a structured vocabulary that categorizes genes and their products into three main categories: Molecular Function (what it does), Biological Process (how it does it), and Cellular Component (where it does it). A pathway, on the other hand, refers to a set of predefined genes involved in a coordinated sequence of molecular events or cellular processes that collectively perform a specific biological function. Examples of biological pathways include the “Glycolysis pathway”, which breaks down glucose into pyruvate; and the “MAPK signaling pathway”, which is involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and response to external stimuli. While GO enrichment analysis provides more general insights, pathway analysis focuses specifically on predefined pathways. Both methods are commonly practiced and can be achieved with the getEnrichedGO and getEnrichedPATH function in ChIPpeakAnno.
In the following demonstration, we first annotate macs_peak_gr2 (obtained in Section 2.1) using genes from EnsDb, and perform GO and pathway enrichment analysis.
anno_data <- genes(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
annotated_peak4 <- annotatePeakInBatch(macs_peak_gr2,
AnnotationData = anno_data,
output = "both")
enriched_go <- getEnrichedGO(annotated_peak4,
orgAnn = "org.Hs.eg.db",
feature_id_type = "ensembl_gene_id")
enrichmentPlot(enriched_go, label_wrap = 60)
Figure 14: Histogram showing enriched GO terms
Please ensure to enclose the "org.Hs.eg.db" in quotes, and that the feature_id_type matches the ID type stored in the feature metadata column of your annotated peak object. If you are using genes from TxDb for peak annotation, the feature is likely entrez_id. If you are using genes from EnsDb for annotation, the feature should be ensembl_gene_id. The code snippet below shows the number of enriched GO terms in each category, “bp” for “biological process”, “cc” for “cellular component”, and “mf” for “molecular function”. By default, multiAdjMethod = NULL meaning that no multiple testing correction is performed.
length(enriched_go[["bp"]][["go.id"]])## [1] 68length(enriched_go[["cc"]][["go.id"]])## [1] 8length(enriched_go[["mf"]][["go.id"]])## [1] 21It turns out that if using the subset of annotated macs_peak_gr2 leads to zero enriched GO terms under the “bp” and “cc” categories, and 6 hits under the “mf” category. It suggests taht there are no significantly enriched “bp” or “cc” terms associated with the subset of peaks. However, there are 6 significantly enriched “mf” terms.
head(enriched_go[["mf"]], n = 2)## go.id go.term
## 1 GO:0005031 tumor necrosis factor receptor activity
## 2 GO:0005031 tumor necrosis factor receptor activity
## Definition
## 1 Combining with tumor necrosis factor, a proinflammatory cytokine produced by monocytes and macrophages, to initiate a change in cell function.
## 2 Combining with tumor necrosis factor, a proinflammatory cytokine produced by monocytes and macrophages, to initiate a change in cell function.
## Ontology count.InDataset count.InGenome pvalue totaltermInDataset
## 1 MF 2 10 0.001177635 1449
## 2 MF 2 10 0.001177635 1449
## totaltermInGenome EntrezID
## 1 279266 8718
## 2 279266 8764Pathway enrichment analysis can be performed using popular databases such as Reactome and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes). Reactome is renowned for its detailed and expert-curated information, while KEGG offers a broader scope of information, including pathways, diseases, drugs, and more organisms. The getEnrichedPATH function can use either database by specifying the pathAnn parameter.
For demonstration, we will use the built-in dataset annotatedPeaks with Reactome database. Be aware that the feature_id_type for this dataset is ensembl_gene_id. To switch to the KEGG database, simply set pathAnn = "KEGGREST".
library(reactome.db)
data(annotatedPeak)
enriched_path <- getEnrichedPATH(annotatedPeak,
orgAnn = "org.Hs.eg.db",
feature_id_type = "ensembl_gene_id",
pathAnn = "reactome.db")To visualize the enriched pathways, we can use the enrichmentPlot function.
enrichmentPlot(enriched_path)
Figure 15: Histogram showing enriched pathways
To use getEnrichedGO and getEnrichedPATH, an OrgDb annotation package is necessary. For species that are less common and do not have a valid OrgDb available, users can find alternative methods in this post.
10 Motif analysis
Sequence motif refer to a recurring pattern in DNA that is believed to have a biological function. These motifs often indicate binding sites for proteins like TFs, some other motifs play a role at the RNA level such as ribosome binding and transcription termination. For peaks obtained through experiments like TF ChIP-seq, motif analysis aids in validating expected binding factors or discovering the TFBSs, while unanticipated motifs suggest the presence of co-binding factors.
ChIPpeakAnno provides several functions that are related to motif analysis, details see below.
+ getAllPeakSequence: obtain genomic sequences around peaks
+ Obtained sequences can be used for motif discovery or PCR validation
+ oligoSummary: find consensus sequences (motifs) in peak sequences
+ summarizePatternInPeaks: check if given motifs appear in peak sequences
10.1 Obtain sequences surrounding the peaks
Here is an example of how to retrieve the peak sequences, including 20bp upstream and 20bp downstream, for the macs_peak_gr2 peaks obtained in Section 3.
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
sequence_around_peak <- getAllPeakSequence(macs_peak_gr2,
upstream = 20,
downstream = 20,
genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
head(sequence_around_peak, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | score upstream downstream
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric> <numeric>
## MACS_peak_1 chr1 28341-29610 * | 1 20 20
## MACS_peak_2 chr1 90821-91234 * | 1 20 20
## sequence
## <character>
## MACS_peak_1 CTGTAGTTGCTCATCTGAAG..
## MACS_peak_2 GCTGCTGCTGTCTGTAGCTG..
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genomeThe genome argument can accept either a BSgenome object or a Mart object. It is important to ensure that the genome version used matches the one used for creating the peak file. You can find a full list of available BSgenome objects on this site.
The following example demonstrates on how to use the mart option. It is slower compared to using a BSgenome because it queries the BioMart for annotations on the fly if AnnotationData is not set. Refer to Section 5.5 for more on Mart.
library(biomaRt)
mart <- useMart(biomart="ENSEMBL_MART_ENSEMBL",
dataset="hsapiens_gene_ensembl")
sequence_around_peak <- getAllPeakSequence(macs_peak_gr2[1],
upstream = 20,
downstream = 20,
genome = mart)To save the sequences into fasta, use the write2FASTA function.
write2FASTA(sequence_around_peak, file = "macs_peak_gr2.fa")10.2 Discover consensus sequences (motifs) in the peaks
The oligoSummary function utilizes Markov models to ascertain if a motif is enriched in a set of sequences relative to the background. As a prerequisite, we must first calculate the frequencies of all combinations of short oligonucleotides of a specified length in the background (Leung, Marsh, and Speed 1996). This can be accomplished using the oligoFrequency function. In the example below, we aim to identify consensus sequences of length 6.
freqs <- oligoFrequency(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38$chr1)
motif_summary <- oligoSummary(sequence_around_peak,
oligoLength = 6,
MarkovOrder = 3,
freqs = freqs,
quickMotif = TRUE)Here is a breakdown of the arguments:
- oligoLength: the length of the motifs to search for
- MarkovOrder: the order of a Markov chain, which determines how much the current state in the chain depends on previous states; simply put, a zero-order Markov chain does not consider any context or dependencies between adjacent elements, while higher-order Markov chains capture longer-range dependencies in sequences, making them more suitable for modeling complex sequence patterns
- freqs: the background motif frequencies used for the Markov model
- quickMotif: whether or not to generate the motif matrices
The resulting motif_summary is a list containing three elements:
- zscore: the Z-score of each oligonucleotide, which quantifies how many standard deviations away the observed count is from the expected count; a high positive score suggests that the motif is significantly over-represented in the peaks
- counts: the count numbe of each oligonucleotide
- motifs: a list of motif matrices when
quickMotif = TRUE
We can use histogram (hist) to visualize the resulting Z-scores and labels top hits with the text function. Below, we label the name of the motif that has the highest Z-score.
zscore <- sort(motif_summary$zscore)
h <- hist(zscore, breaks = 100, main = "Histogram of Z-score")
text(x = zscore[length(zscore)],
y = h$counts[length(h$counts)] + 1,
labels = names(zscore[length(zscore)]),
adj = 0,
srt = 90)
Figure 16: Histogram showing Z-score distribution
To illustrate how the Z-score can be influenced by the enrichment level of various motifs, the following code utilizes simulated data. We first generate 5000 sequences with lengths ranging between 100 and 2000 nucleotides. Subsequently,we randomly introduce motif 1 into 10% of the sequences and motif 2 into 15% of the sequences.
set.seed(1)
# motifs to simulate
simulate_motif_1 <- "AATTTA"
simulate_motif_2 <- "TGCATG"
# sample 5000 sequences with lengths ranging from 100 to 2000 nucleotides
# randomly insert motif_1 to 10% of the sequences, and motif_2 to 15% of the sequences
simulation_seqs <- sapply(sample(c(1, 2, 0),
5000,
prob = c(0.1, 0.15, 0.75),
replace = TRUE),
function(x) {
seq <- sample(c("A", "T", "C", "G"),
sample.int(1900, 1) + 100,
replace = TRUE)
insert_pos <- sample.int(length(seq) - 6, 1)
if (x == 1) {
seq[insert_pos:(insert_pos + 5)] <- strsplit(simulate_motif_1, "")[[1]]
} else if (x == 2) {
seq[insert_pos:(insert_pos + 5)] <- strsplit(simulate_motif_2, "")[[1]]
}
paste(seq, collapse = "")
}
)
motif_summary_simu <- oligoSummary(simulation_seqs,
oligoLength = 6,
MarkovOrder = 3,
quickMotif = TRUE)
zscore_simu <- sort(motif_summary_simu$zscore,
decreasing = TRUE)
h_simu <- hist(x = zscore_simu,
breaks = 100,
main = "Histogram of Z-score for simulation data")
text(x = zscore_simu[1:2],
y = rep(5, 2),
labels = names(zscore_simu[1:2]),
adj = 0,
srt = 90)
Figure 17: Histogram showing Z-score distribution for simulation data
As evident from the simulation results, the higher the probability of the motif, the larger the resulting Z-score. In addition, you can visualize the motif using the motifStack package.
library(motifStack)
pfm <- new("pfm", mat = motif_summary_simu$motifs[[1]],
name = "sample motif 1")
motifStack(pfm)
To loop through each element in motif_summary$motifs, we can use the mapply function.
pfms <- mapply(function(motif, id) { new("pfm", mat = motif, name = as.character(id)) },
motif_summary$motifs,
seq_along(motif_summary$motifs))
motifStack(pfms[[1]])
Figure 18: Plot showing the first motif detected
10.3 Scan pre-defined sequence patterns in the peaks
If you have a list of motifs (sequence patterns), the summarizePatternInPeaks function can be utilized to determine whether they are present in the peaks.
example_pattern_file <- system.file("extdata/examplePattern.fa",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
readLines(example_pattern_file)## [1] ">ExamplePattern" "GGNCCK" ">ExamplePattern" "AACCNM"pattern_in_peak <- summarizePatternInPeaks(patternFilePath = example_pattern_file,
BSgenomeName = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38,
peaks = macs_peak_gr2[1:200],
bgdForPerm = "chromosome",
nperm = 100,
method = "permutation.test")
pattern_in_peak$motif_enrichment## patternNum totalNumPatternWithSameLen patternRate cutOffPermutationTest
## GGNCCK 1351 169140 0.007987466 0.002140105
## AACCNM 586 169140 0.003464586 0.003781629head(pattern_in_peak$motif_occurrence, n = 2)## motifChr motifStartInChr motifEndInChr motifName motifPattern
## 1 chr1 28746 28751 ExamplePattern GGNCCK
## 2 chr1 29049 29054 ExamplePattern GGNCCK
## motifStartInPeak motifEndInPeak motifFound motifFoundStrand peakChr peakStart
## 1 406 411 GGACCG + chr1 28341
## 2 709 714 GGGCCG + chr1 28341
## peakEnd peakWidth peakStrand
## 1 29610 1270 *
## 2 29610 1270 *The summarziePatternInPeaks function provides two distinct methods (method = c("binom.test", "permutation.test")) for evaluating the significance of given motif enrichment within target peaks. When utilizing the “binom.test” method, the expected frequencies for each motif must be determined first, which can be achieved via expectFrequencyMethod = c("Markov", "Naive"). When employing the “permutation.test” method, users need to provide parameters such as the number of permutation (“nperm”), the significance level (“alpha”), and methods how background sequences are determined (bgdForPerm = c("shuffle", "chromosome"), chromosome = c("asPeak", "random")).
The outcome from summarizePatternInPeaks comprises two tables. The “motif_enrichment” table succinctly summarizes the enrichment statistics for each motif. Specifically, when method = "binom.test", the last column “pValueBinomTest” represents the P-values resulting from the binomial test. Conversely, when method = "permutation.test", the last column “cutOffPermutationTest” denotes the threshold value derived from the permutation test, determined by the specified signifiance level. The “motif_occurrence” table contains detailed information regarding the occurrences of each motif within every peak.
10.4 Alternative tools
Besides using ChIPpeakAnno, users can extract the sequences with the getAllPeakSequence function and employ other tools such as MEME Suite for motif-related analysis.
11 Peak profile comparison
When analyzing two or more peak sets from different experiments (e.g. two TFs), it can be insightful to examine whether the peak profiles correlate, and if they do, how do they compare to each other. ChIPpeakAnno not only offers functions to assess if there is a significant overlap among multiple peak sets, but it also provides visualization functions for easy comparison of peak patterns side-by-side.
The significance of overlap can be determined with hypergeometric test or permutation test, both of which are available in ChIPpeakAnno. Please be advised that, due to the inherent challenges in estimating the totalTest parameter for the hypergeometric test, we strongly discourage the use of this approach.
11.1 Use hypergeometric test to determine overlap among peak sets
The hypergeometric test is grounded in the principle of the hypergeometric distribution, which is a probability distribution that describes the likelihood of drawing a specific number of successes (k) from a sample size of n, given a finite population (N) that contains K successes when sampling is done without replacement. The null hypothesis posits that the sample is drawn randomly from the population, implying that the there is no overlap between the two sets of peaks. A small P-value indicates that the null should be rejected, indicating a significant overlap between the two sets of peaks.
In ChIPpeakAnno, the hypergeometric test is incorporated into the makeVennDiagram function, as detailed in Section 4.2.2. The following example illustrates how to compute the hypergeometric test P-values for peak sets from three TF ChIP-seq experiments.
tf1 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/TAF.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")
tf2 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/Tead4.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")
tf3 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/YY1.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")To effectively apply the hypergeometric test, we first need to estimate the total number of binding sites, i.e. totalTest. The selection of totalTest affects the stringency of the test, with smaller values resulting in a more conservative outcome (larger P-values). For practical guidance on how to choose an appropriate value for totalTest, you can refer to this post.
In our example, we assume that potential binding regions (which include coding regions and promoter regions) constitute 3% (fairly rough estimation) of the entire genome. Since the example data is derived from chromosome 2, we can estimate the number of total binding sites as (length of chr2) * 3% / (mean peak length).
overlapping_peaks <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(tf1,
tf2,
tf3,
connectedPeaks = "keepAll")
mean_peak_width <- mean(width(unlist(GRangesList(overlapping_peaks[["all.peaks"]]))))
total_binding_sites <- length(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38[["chr2"]]) * 0.03 / mean_peak_width
venn1 <- makeVennDiagram(overlapping_peaks,
totalTest = total_binding_sites,
connectedPeaks = "keepAll",
fill = c("#CC79A7", "#56B4E9", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"))
Figure 19: Venn diagram1 showing overlapping peaks
For the P-values of each peak pair:
venn1[["p.value"]]## tf1 tf2 tf3 pval
## [1,] 0 1 1 4.565072e-52
## [2,] 1 0 1 0.000000e+00
## [3,] 1 1 0 2.744460e-88For the overlapping peak counts:
venn1[["vennCounts"]]## tf1 tf2 tf3 Counts count.tf1 count.tf2 count.tf3
## [1,] 0 0 0 4953.594 0 0 0
## [2,] 0 0 1 621.000 0 0 621
## [3,] 0 1 0 2097.000 0 2097 0
## [4,] 0 1 1 309.000 0 310 319
## [5,] 1 0 0 59.000 59 0 0
## [6,] 1 0 1 166.000 172 0 170
## [7,] 1 1 0 8.000 8 8 0
## [8,] 1 1 1 476.000 545 537 521
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "VennCounts"The parameter connectedPeaks denotes how to calculate peak counts when multiple peaks from different groups overlap. If connectedPeaks = "keepFirstListConsistent", the counts from the first group will be consistently displayed in the plot. If connectedPeaks = "keepAll", you will see multiple numbers: all original peak counts for each group will be displayed in parentheses, while the count of the minimally involved peaks will be displayed outside the parentheses.
venn2 <- makeVennDiagram(overlapping_peaks,
totalTest = total_binding_sites,
connectedPeaks = "keepFirstListConsistent",
fill = c("#CC79A7", "#56B4E9", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"))
Figure 20: Venn diagram2 showing overlapping peaks
Given that all the P-values are extremely small, we must reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that each pair of peak sets significantly overlaps with each other. A major drawback of this approach is the necessity to estimate a totalTest, which could dramatically affect the test results. For instance, if we choose “2%” instead of “3%” in the above example, the P-value for tf1 vs. tf2 increases to 0.49, meaning we can no longer reject the null. To circumvent the requirement of totalTest, we have integrated a permutation test in the peakPermTest function.
11.2 Use permutation test to determine overlap among peak sets
The permutation test is a non-parametric test, which means it does not require the data to adhere to any specific distribution. The test statistic is determined according to the observed data, and the null distribution of the test statistic is estimated using a permutation (re-sampling) procedure.
In our scenario, the number of overlapping peaks is treated as the test statistic. Its null distribution is estimated by first re-sampling peaks from a random peak list (the peak pool, which represents all potential binding sites) followed by counting the number of overlapping peaks. The random peak list is generated using the distributions found from the input peaks, ensuring that the peak widths and relative binding positions to the features (such as TSS and geneEnd) follow the same distributions as the input peaks. When the null hypothesis is valid, the number of overlapping peaks is not significantly different from what would be expected by chance. Here are some sample codes using peakPermTest.
Example1 demonstrates a permutation test for non-relevant peak sets.
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
txdb <- TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene
set.seed(123)
# Example1: non-relevant peak sets
utr5 <- unique(unlist(fiveUTRsByTranscript(txdb)))
utr3 <- unique(unlist(threeUTRsByTranscript(txdb)))
utr5 <- utr5[sample.int(length(utr5), 1000)]
utr3 <- utr3[sample.int(length(utr3), 1000)]
pt1 <- peakPermTest(peaks1 = utr3,
peaks2 = utr5,
TxDb = txdb,
maxgap = 500,
seed = 1)
plot(pt1)
Figure 21: Permutation test for non-relevant peak sets
Example2 demonstrates a permutation test for highly relevant peak sets.
# Example2: highly relevant peak sets
cds <- unique(unlist(cdsBy(txdb)))
ol <- findOverlaps(cds, utr3, maxgap = 1)
peaks2 <- c(cds[sample.int(length(cds), 500)],
cds[queryHits(ol)][sample.int(length(ol), 500)])
pt2 <- peakPermTest(peaks1 = utr3,
peaks2 = peaks2,
TxDb = txdb,
maxgap = 500,
seed = 1)
plot(pt2)
Figure 22: Permutation test for highly relevant peak sets
As observed, for highly relevant peak sets, the P-value is very small.
11.2.1 Use custom peak pool
The peakPermTest function can automatically generate a peak pool given the peak binding type (bindingType = c("TSS", "geneEnd")), annotation type (featureType = c("transcript", "exon")), and annotation data (TxDb). Additionally, users have the option to construct the peak pool from actual binding sites derived from experimental data, with hot spots removed. Hot spots refer to genomic regions that have a high likelihood of being bound by many TFs in ChIP-seq experiments (Yip et al. 2012). We recommend removing hot spots prior to the permutation test to prevent overestimation of the association between two input peak sets. Users are also advised to remove ENCODE blacklist regions. The blacklists were constructed by identifying consistently problematic regions across independent cell lines and types of experiments for each species in the ENCODE and modENCODE datasets (Consortium 2012).
Below is an example of creating a peak pool for the human genome using the TF binding site clusters downloaded from ENCODE. The following steps are involved:
- Step1: download TF binding sites
- Step2: download hot spots
- Step3: liftover hot spots to hg38 (if necessary)
- Step4: select peak sets to test
- Step5: remove hot spots from binding pool
- Step6: perform permutation test
# Step1: download TF binding sites
temp <- tempfile()
download.file(file.path("https://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/",
"goldenpath/",
"hg38/",
"encRegTfbsClustered/",
"encRegTfbsClusteredWithCells.hg38.bed.gz"),
temp)
df_tfbs <- read.delim(gzfile(temp, "r"), header = FALSE)
unlink(temp)
colnames(df_tfbs)[1:4] <- c("seqnames", "start", "end", "TF")
tfbs_hg38 <- GRanges(as.character(df_tfbs$seqnames),
IRanges(df_tfbs$start, df_tfbs$end),
TF = df_tfbs$TF)
# Step2: download hot spots
base_url <- "http://metatracks.encodenets.gersteinlab.org/metatracks/"
temp1 <- tempfile()
temp2 <- tempfile()
download.file(file.path(base_url,
"HOT_All_merged.tar.gz"),
temp1)
download.file(file.path(base_url,
"HOT_intergenic_All_merged.tar.gz"),
temp2)
untar(temp1, exdir = dirname(temp1))
untar(temp2, exdir = dirname(temp1))
bedfiles <- dir(dirname(temp1), "bed$")
hot_spots_hg19 <- sapply(file.path(dirname(temp1), bedfiles), toGRanges, format = "BED")
unlink(temp1)
unlink(temp2)
names(hot_spots_hg19) <- gsub("_merged.bed", "", bedfiles)
hot_spots_hg19 <- sapply(hot_spots_hg19, unname)
hot_spots_hg19 <- GRangesList(hot_spots_hg19)
# Step3: liftover hot spots to hg38
library(R.utils)
temp_chain_gz <- tempfile()
temp_chain <- tempfile()
base_url_chain <- "http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenpath/"
download.file(file.path(base_url_chain,
"hg19/liftOver/",
"hg19ToHg38.over.chain.gz"),
temp_chain_gz)
gunzip(filename = temp_chain_gz, destname = temp_chain)
chain_file <- import.chain(hg19_to_hg38)
unlink(temp_chain_gz)
unlink(temp_chain)
hot_spots_hg38 <- liftOver(hot_spots_hg19, chain_file)
# Step4: select peak sets to test
tfbs_hg38_by_TF <- split(tfbs_hg38, tfbs_hg38$TF)
TAF1 <- tfbs_hg38_by_TF[["TAF1"]]
TEAD4 <- tfbs_hg38_by_TF[["TEAD4"]]
# Step5: remove hot spots from binding pool
tfbs_hg38 <- subsetByOverlaps(tfbs_hg38, hot_spots_hg38, invert=TRUE)
tfbs_hg38 <- reduce(tfbs_hg38)
# Step6: perform permutation test
pool <- new("permPool",
grs = GRangesList(tfbs_hg38),
N = length(TAF1))
pt3 <- peakPermTest(TAF1, TEAD4, pool = pool, ntimes = 500)
plot(pt3)
Figure 23: Permutation test using custom peak pool
11.3 Visualize TSS enrichment signal of multiple experiments
If you have peak files obtained from multiple TF ChIP-seq experiments and would like to compare their enriched signals around TSS using raw signals such as read coverage. ChIPpeakAnno provides two functions, featureAlignedHeatmap and featureAlignedDistribution, to visualize their binding patterns side-by-side.
To illustrate this, we first need to prepare both the peak data and coverage information (bigWig). This involves four steps:
- Step1: read in example peak files
- Step2: find peaks that are shared by all
- Step3: read in example coverage files
- Step4: visualize binding patterns
# Step1: read in example peak files
extdata_path <- system.file("extdata", package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
broadPeaks <- dir(extdata_path, "broadPeak")
gr_TFs <- sapply(file.path(extdata_path, broadPeaks), toGRanges, format = "broadPeak")
names(gr_TFs) <- gsub(".broadPeak", "", broadPeaks)
names(gr_TFs)## [1] "TAF" "Tead4" "YY1"Now, we have imported peak files for three TFs (“TAF”, “Tead”, and “YY1”) into the gr_TFs object. The next step is to identify overlapping peaks to ensure that we are comparing binding patterns over the same genomic regions.
# Step2: find peaks that are shared by all
ol <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(gr_TFs)
gr_TFs_ol <- ol$peaklist$`TAF///Tead4///YY1`
# Step3: read in example coverage files
# here we read in coverage data from -2000bp to -2000bp of each shared peak center
gr_TFs_ol_center <- reCenterPeaks(gr_TFs_ol, width = 4000) # use the center of the peaks and extend 2000bp upstream and downstream to obtain peaks with uniform length of 4000bp
bigWigs <- dir(extdata_path, "bigWig")
coverage_list <- sapply(file.path(extdata_path, bigWigs),
import, # rtracklayer::import
format = "BigWig",
which = gr_TFs_ol_center,
as = "RleList")
names(coverage_list) <- gsub(".bigWig", "", bigWigs)
names(coverage_list)## [1] "TAF" "Tead4" "YY1"11.3.1 Heatmap
# Step4: visualize binding patterns
sig <- featureAlignedSignal(coverage_list, gr_TFs_ol_center)
# since the bigWig files are only a subset of the original files,
# filter to keep peaks that are with coverage data for all peak sets
keep <- rowSums(sig[[1]]) > 0 & rowSums(sig[[2]]) > 0 & rowSums(sig[[3]]) > 0
sig <- sapply(sig, function(x) x[keep, ], simplify = FALSE)
gr_TFs_ol_center <- gr_TFs_ol_center[keep]
featureAlignedHeatmap(sig, gr_TFs_ol_center,
upper.extreme=c(3, 0.5, 4))
Figure 24: Heatmap of coverages for selected TFs
By default, the rows in the heatmap are ordered by the total coverage per row from the first sample (“TAF” in this example). We can reorder the rows by tuning the sortBy option. For example, setting sortBy = "YY1" will order the rows by the “YY1” sample in the dataset. You can also sort the rows based on hierarchical clustering results. Here is a demonstration:
# perform hierarchical clustering on rows
sig_rowsums <- sapply(sig, rowSums, na.rm = TRUE)
row_distance <- dist(sig_rowsums)
hc <- hclust(row_distance)
# use hierarchical clustering order to sort
gr_TFs_ol_center$sort_by <- hc$order
featureAlignedHeatmap(sig, gr_TFs_ol_center,
upper.extreme = c(3, 0.5, 4),
sortBy = "sort_by")
Figure 25: Heatmap of coverages for selected TFs sorted by hierarchical clustering
11.3.2 Density plot
Additionally, we can create a density plot using the featureAlignedDistribution function.
featureAlignedDistribution(sig, gr_TFs_ol_center,
type = "l")
Figure 26: Distribution of coverage densities for selected TFs
12 Common workflow 1: single TF with replicates
For experiments targeting a single TF with replicates, a common analytic strategy is outlined below.
- Step1: import data
- Convert
BED/GFFfiles into GRanges - Find overlapping peaks among replicates
- Add metadata (optional)
- Visualize replicate concordance using a Venn diagram
- Convert
- Step2: prepare annotation file
- Step3: visualize peak distribution
- Step4: annotate peaks
- Find possible enhancers
- Find potential bi-directional promoters
- Step5: perform enrichment analysis
- Step6: conduct motif analysis
12.1 Step1: import data
Common peak formats such as BED, GFF, and MACS can be converted into GRanges format using the toGRanges function. After importing the data, concordance across peak replicates will be evaluated with findOverlapsOfPeaks and makeVennDiagram. Be aware that the metadata columns will be dropped for the merged overlapping peaks. To add them back, we can use the addMetadata function. For example, addMetadata(ol, colNames = "score", FUN = mean) will add a “score” column to each merged overlapping peak by taking the mean score of individual peaks involved.
library(ChIPpeakAnno)
# Convert BED/GFF into GRanges
bed1 <- system.file("extdata", "MACS_output_hg38.bed",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
gr1 <- toGRanges(bed1, format = "BED", header = FALSE)
gff1 <- system.file("extdata", "GFF_peaks_hg38.gff",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
gr2 <- toGRanges(gff1, format = "GFF", header = FALSE)
# Find overlapping peaks
ol <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(gr1, gr2)
# Add "score" metadata column to overlapping peaks
ol <- addMetadata(ol, colNames = "score", FUN = mean)
head(ol$mergedPeaks, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## [1] chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## [2] chr1 789471-791811 * | gr2__003,gr1__MACS_peak_14
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsvenn <- makeVennDiagram(ol,
fill = c("#009E73", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2"))
Figure 27: Venn diagram showing the number of overlapping peaks for gr1 and gr2
For the P-value of hypergeometric test:
venn[["p.value"]]## gr1 gr2 pval
## [1,] 1 1 0For overlapping peak counts:
venn[["vennCounts"]]## gr1 gr2 Counts count.gr1 count.gr2
## [1,] 0 0 0 0 0
## [2,] 0 1 61 0 61
## [3,] 1 0 63 63 0
## [4,] 1 1 165 167 168
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "VennCounts"As observed, the extremely small P-value suggests a high relevance between the two peak sets, reflecting good consistency among experimental replicates.
12.2 Step2: prepare annotation file
Similar to the peak files, the annotation file must also be converted into a GRanges object. Annotation GRanges can be constructed from not only BED, GFF, and user-defined text files, but also from EnsDb and TxDb objects using the toGRanges function. For EnsDb and TxDb objects, annotation can also be prepared with accessor functions, as detailed in Section 5.2. Note that the version of genome used to create the annotation file must match the genome used for peak calling, as feature positions may vary across different genome releases. As an example, if you are using Mus_musculus.v103 for read mapping, it’s best to use EnsDb.Mmusculus.v103 for annotation.
library(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86)
ensembl.hs86.gene <- toGRanges(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86, feature = "gene")
head(ensembl.hs86.gene, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | gene_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character>
## ENSG00000223972 chr1 11869-14409 + | DDX11L1
## ENSG00000227232 chr1 14404-29570 - | WASH7P
## -------
## seqinfo: 357 sequences (1 circular) from 2 genomes (hg38, GRCh38)12.3 Step3: visualize peak distribution
12.3.1 Peak distribution relative to features
Now, given the merged overlapping peaks and annotation data, we can visualize the distribution of the distance from the merged overlapping peaks to the nearest features, such as genes (TSSs), using the binOverFeature function.
binOverFeature(ol$mergedPeaks,
nbins = 20,
annotationData = ensembl.hs86.gene,
xlab = "peak distance from TSSs (bp)",
ylab = "peak count",
main = "Distribution of aggregated peak numbers around TSS")
Figure 28: Peak count distribution around transcription start sites
12.3.2 Peak distribution over multiple feature levels
We can use the genomicElementDistribution to summarize the distribution of peaks over different types of genomic features such exon, intron, enhancer, UTR. When inputting a single peak file, a pie graph will be generated.
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
genomicElementDistribution(ol$mergedPeaks,
TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
Figure 29: Pie graph showing peak distributions over different genomic features
As can be seen, a significant number of peaks originate from promoter regions, which is consistent with the signature of peaks obtained from Tf binding experiments. When inputting a list of peak sets (e.g. replicates), a bar graph will be generated.
macs_peaks <- GRangesList(rep1 = gr1,
rep2 = gr2)
genomicElementDistribution(macs_peaks,
TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
Figure 30: Bar graph showing peak distributions over different genomic features for two replicates
According to the bar graph, the two peak replicates are consistent.
12.3.3 Peak overlappings for multiple features
To visualize peak overlap for multiple feature sets, we can utilize the UpSet plot (for details, see Section 6.3).
library(UpSetR)
res <- genomicElementUpSetR(ol$mergedPeak,
TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
upset(res[["plotData"]],
nsets = length(colnames(res$plotData)),
nintersects = NA)
Figure 31: UpSet plot showing peak overlappings for multiple features
12.4 Step4: annotate peaks
Based on the above distribution of aggregated peak numbers around the TSS and the distribution of peaks in different chromosomal regions, most of the peaks locate near the TSS. Therefore, it is reasonable to adopt the feature-centric method to annotate the peaks residing in the promoter regions. Promoters can be specified with the bindingRegion parameter. In the following example, the promoter region is defined as 2000bp upstream and 500bp downstream of the TSS (bindingRegion = c(-2000, 500)).
ol_anno <- annotatePeakInBatch(ol$mergedPeak,
AnnotationData = ensembl.hs86.gene,
output = "nearestBiDirectionalPromoters",
bindingRegion = c(-2000, 500))
head(ol_anno, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## X1 chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## X1 chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## peak feature feature.ranges feature.strand distance
## <character> <character> <IRanges> <Rle> <integer>
## X1 X1 ENSG00000228327 725885-778626 - 0
## X1 X1 ENSG00000237491 778770-810060 + 0
## insideFeature distanceToSite gene_name
## <character> <integer> <character>
## X1 overlapStart 0 RP11-206L10.2
## X1 overlapStart 0 RP11-206L10.9
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsYou can export the annotation to a CSV file:
ol_anno <- unname(ol_anno) # remove names to avoid duplicate row.names error
ol_anno$peakNames <- NULL # remove peakNames to avoid unimplemented type 'list' error
write.csv(as.data.frame(ol_anno), "ol_anno.csv")To visualize the distribution of peaks around features:
pie1(table(ol_anno$insideFeature))
Figure 32: Pie chart showing peak distribution around features
12.4.1 Find peaks located in bi-directional promoters
In addition to using the output = "nearestBiDirectionalPromoters" option, ChIPpeakAnno provides another helper function called peaksNearBDP to fetch statistics for peaks situated in bi-directional promoters.
peaks_near_BDP <- peaksNearBDP(ol$mergedPeaks,
AnnotationData = ensembl.hs86.gene,
MaxDistance = 5000)
# MaxDistance will be translated into "bindingRegion =
# c(-MaxDistance, MaxDistance)" internally
peaks_near_BDP$n.peaks## [1] 165peaks_near_BDP$n.peaksWithBDP## [1] 18peaks_near_BDP$percentPeaksWithBDP## [1] 0.1090909head(peaks_near_BDP$peaksWithBDP, n = 2)## GRangesList object of length 2:
## $`1`
## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 10 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## X1 chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## X1 chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## bdp_idx peak feature feature.ranges feature.strand
## <integer> <character> <character> <IRanges> <Rle>
## X1 1 X1 ENSG00000228327 725885-778626 -
## X1 1 X1 ENSG00000237491 778770-810060 +
## distance insideFeature distanceToSite gene_name
## <integer> <character> <integer> <character>
## X1 0 overlapStart 0 RP11-206L10.2
## X1 0 overlapStart 0 RP11-206L10.9
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
##
## $`4`
## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 10 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames bdp_idx
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList> <integer>
## X4 chr1 920981-921619 * | gr1__MACS_peak_17,gr2__005 4
## X4 chr1 920981-921619 * | gr1__MACS_peak_17,gr2__005 4
## peak feature feature.ranges feature.strand distance
## <character> <character> <IRanges> <Rle> <integer>
## X4 X4 ENSG00000223764 916865-921016 - 0
## X4 X4 ENSG00000187634 923928-944581 + 2308
## insideFeature distanceToSite gene_name
## <character> <integer> <character>
## X4 overlapStart 0 RP11-54O7.3
## X4 upstream 2308 SAMD11
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths12.4.2 Find peaks located in enhancers
Enhancers are DNA sequences that can amplify gene expression and are frequently used as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and treatment. They can be identified using a variety of experimental methods such as 3C, 5C, and HiC (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). With enhancers obtained through these experimental techniques, we can locate peaks that locate to potential enhancer regions. The following example uses 5C data derived with the hg19 genome assembly, hence, it’s necessary to use a matching annotation file.
library(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v75)
ensembl.hs75.gene <- toGRanges(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v75, feature = "gene")
DNA5C <- system.file("extdata",
"wgEncodeUmassDekker5CGm12878PkV2.bed.gz",
package="ChIPpeakAnno")
DNAinteractiveData <- toGRanges(gzfile(DNA5C))
# the example bed.gz file can also be downloaded from:
# https://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenpath/hg19/encodeDCC/wgEncodeUmassDekker5C/wgEncodeUmassDekker5CGm12878PkV2.bed.gz
peaks_near_enhancer <- findEnhancers(peaks = ol$mergedPeaks,
annoData = ensembl.hs75.gene,
DNAinteractiveData = DNAinteractiveData)
head(peaks_near_enhancer, n = 2)## GRanges object with 1 range and 14 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## X1 chr1 151619224-151619324 * | gr2__229,gr1__MACS_peak_229
## feature feature.ranges feature.strand feature.shift.ranges
## <character> <IRanges> <Rle> <IRanges>
## X1 ENSG00000143393 151264273-151300191 - 151619414-151655333
## feature.shift.strand distance insideFeature distanceToSite gene_name
## <Rle> <integer> <character> <integer> <character>
## X1 + 89 upstream 89 PI4KB
## DNAinteractive.idx peak DNAinteractive.ranges DNAinteractive.blocks
## <integer> <character> <IRanges> <IRangesList>
## X1 814 X1 151283079-151636526 1-5699,335673-353448
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths12.5 Step5: perform enrichment analysis
With annotated peaks, we can use the getEnrichedGO and getEnrichedPATH functions to respectively retrieve a list of enriched GO or pathway terms.
library(org.Hs.eg.db)
enriched_go <- getEnrichedGO(annotatedPeak = ol_anno,
orgAnn = "org.Hs.eg.db",
feature_id_type = "ensembl_gene_id",
condense = TRUE)
enrichmentPlot(enriched_go)
Figure 33: Histogram showing enriched GO terms
Likewise, the following pertains to pathway enrichment analysis.
library(reactome.db)
enriched_pathway <- getEnrichedPATH(annotatedPeak = ol_anno,
orgAnn = "org.Hs.eg.db",
pathAnn = "KEGGREST",
maxP = 0.05)
enrichmentPlot(enriched_pathway)
Figure 34: Histogram showing enriched pathways
# To remove the common suffix " - Homo sapiens (human)":
enrichmentPlot(enriched_pathway, label_substring_to_remove = " - Homo sapiens \\(human\\)")
Figure 35: Histogram showing enriched pathways
12.6 Step6: conduct motif analysis
To perform motif analysis, we first need to extract sequences surrounding the peaks, then acquire the consensus sequences. We can also visualize the top motifs discovered.
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
seq_around_peak <- getAllPeakSequence(ol$mergedPeaks,
upstream = 20,
downstream = 20,
genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
head(seq_around_peak, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | peakNames
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## [1] chr1 778411-780198 * | gr1__MACS_peak_13,gr2__001,gr2__002
## [2] chr1 789471-791811 * | gr2__003,gr1__MACS_peak_14
## upstream downstream sequence
## <numeric> <numeric> <character>
## [1] 20 20 TGCGCCATGTTGCTAGGCTG..
## [2] 20 20 AGAATTGAATTGAATGGACT..
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genomeWe can use the write2FASTA function to store the result in a FASTA file. The following code snippet generates Z-scores for short oligos of length 6.
freqs <- oligoFrequency(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38$chr1)
motif_summary <- oligoSummary(seq_around_peak,
oligoLength = 6,
MarkovOrder = 3,
freqs = freqs,
quickMotif = TRUE)
zscore <- sort(motif_summary$zscore)
h <- hist(zscore,
breaks = 100,
main = "Histogram of Z-score")
text(x = zscore[length(zscore)],
y = h$counts[length(h$counts)] + 1,
labels = names(zscore[length(zscore)]),
adj = 0,
srt = 90)
Figure 36: Histogram showing Z-score distribution for oligos of length 6
We can use motifStack to visualize the top discovered motifs.
library(motifStack)
pfm <- new("pfm", mat = motif_summary$motifs[[1]],
name = "sample motif 1")
motifStack(pfm)
Figure 37: Sequence log of detected motif 1
13 Common workflow 2: comparing binding profiles for multiple TFs
Given two or more peak sets from different TFs, it might be intriguing to examine if the peak profiles are correlated, and if so, how does the peak patterns compare to each other. The workflow presented here demonstrates how to compare the binding profiles of three TFs. The steps are outlined below.
- Step1: import data
- Step2: determine if there is significant overlap among peak sets
- Step3: visualize and compare the binding patterns
- Heatmap
- Density plot
13.1 Step1: import data
tf1 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/TAF.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")
tf2 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/Tead4.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")
tf3 <- toGRanges(system.file("extdata/YY1.broadPeak", package = "ChIPpeakAnno"),
format = "broadPeak")13.2 Step2: determine if there is significant overlap among peak sets
To examine the associations across different peak sets, ChIPpeakAnno implements both hypergeometric test (makeVennDiagram, for details see Section 11.1) and permutation test (peakPermTest, for details see Section 11.2). For demonstration, here we use hypergeometric test.
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
overlapping_peaks <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(tf1,
tf2,
tf3,
connectedPeaks = "keepAll")
mean_peak_width <- mean(width(unlist(GRangesList(overlapping_peaks[["all.peaks"]]))))
total_binding_sites <- length(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38[["chr2"]]) * 0.03 / mean_peak_width
venn1 <- makeVennDiagram(overlapping_peaks,
totalTest = total_binding_sites,
connectedPeaks = "keepAll",
fill = c("#CC79A7", "#56B4E9", "#F0E442"),
col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"),
cat.col = c("#D55E00", "#0072B2", "#E69F00"))
Figure 38: Venn diagram showing overlapping peaks for three TFs
For the P-values of each peak pair:
venn1[["p.value"]]## tf1 tf2 tf3 pval
## [1,] 0 1 1 4.565072e-52
## [2,] 1 0 1 0.000000e+00
## [3,] 1 1 0 2.744460e-88Given that the P-values are all extremely low, there is a significant overlap between each pair of peak sets.
13.3 Step3: visualize and compare the binding patterns
We can leverage heatmap and density plot to effectively visualize and compare the binding patterns of multiple TFs. For detailed instructions, refer to 11.3.
ol_tfs <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(tf1, tf2, tf3,
connectedPeaks = "keepAll")
gr_ol_tfs <- ol_tfs$peaklist$`tf1///tf2///tf3`
TF_width <- width(gr_ol_tfs)
gr_ol_tfs_center <- reCenterPeaks(gr_ol_tfs, width = 4000)
extdata_path <- system.file("extdata", package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
bigWigs <- dir(extdata_path, "bigWig")
coverage_list <- sapply(file.path(extdata_path, bigWigs),
import, # rtracklayer::import
format = "BigWig",
which = gr_ol_tfs_center,
as = "RleList")
names(coverage_list) <- gsub(".bigWig", "", bigWigs)
sig <- featureAlignedSignal(coverage_list, gr_ol_tfs_center)
# since the bigWig files are only a subset of the original files,
# filter to keep peaks that are with coverage data for all peak sets
keep <- rowSums(sig[[1]]) > 0 & rowSums(sig[[2]]) > 0 & rowSums(sig[[3]]) > 0
sig <- sapply(sig, function(x) x[keep, ], simplify = FALSE)
gr_ol_tfs_center <- gr_ol_tfs_center[keep]
featureAlignedHeatmap(sig, gr_ol_tfs_center,
upper.extreme=c(3, 0.5, 4))
Figure 39: Heatmap of coverages for selected TFs
By default, the rows are arranged according to the total coverage per row from the first sample. Below is an example of how to sort by the third sample (“YY1”) in the dataset through tuning the sortBy option.
featureAlignedHeatmap(sig, gr_ol_tfs_center,
upper.extreme=c(3, 0.5, 4),
sortBy = "YY1")
Figure 40: Heatmap of coverages for selected TFs sorted by YY1 sample
To generate a density plot, use the featureAlignedDistribution function.
featureAlignedDistribution(sig, gr_ol_tfs_center,
type="l")
Figure 41: Distribution of coverage densities for selected TFs
As observed, the binding of “YY1” is significantly stronger, while the binding of “Tead” is considerably weaker.
14 Have questions?
For questions related to usage, please post your queries on the Bioconductor Support Site. If you wish to report a bug or request a new feature, kindly raise an issue on the ChIPpeakAnno GitHub repository.
15 Selected Q & A
15.1 How to import peaks?
ChIPpeakAnno provides a helper function, toGRanges, specifically designed for importing files. Users also have the option to use other tools, such as rtracklayer::import.
15.2 How to properly annotate peaks from ChIP-seq data?
ChIPpeakAnno offers a variety of options for annotating peaks, which can be specified with the output argument in the annotatePeakInBatch function.
- If you are interested in the nearest features surrounding the peaks, set
output = "nearestLocation",output = "shortestDistance", oroutput = "overlapping". This is a peak-centric method, for details see Section 7.1. - If you are interested in the peaks binding to the promoter regions, you can set
output = "upstream". For more flexibility, you can adjust thebindingRegionoption. This is a feature-centric method, for details see Section 7.2
15.3 Should I use annotatePeakInBatch or annoPeaks?
You should use annotatePeakInBatch as it serves as the primary wrapper function that internally calls annoPeaks. Historically, annotatePeakInBatch was primarily composed of peak-centric methods. Over time, feature-centric methods, initially implemented in the annoPeaks function, were integrated into annotatePeakInBatch.
15.4 How to prepare annotation data for annotatePeakInBatch?
Ensure that the annotation data is in GRanges format for annotatePeakInBatch to work. You can convert TxDb, EnsDb, or even GFF and BED, etc. into GRanges using the toGRanges function. Additionally, you can leverage the getAnnotation function to fetch annotation data from BioMart. If needed, you can even create a personalized annotation file. For detailed instructions, see Section 5.
15.5 Can I output either the nearest or overlapping features?
This question pertains to this post.
When you set output = "both", both the “nearest” and “overlapping” features will be output. If your preference is to assign only one type of feature to each peak (either “nearest” or “overlapping”, with a preference for “overlapping” in cases where the “nearest” feature is not “overlapping”), you can use the following strategy: first, annotate peaks with overlapping features; second, annotate peaks lacking overlapping features with the nearest features; last, concatenate the two sets of results. The example codes are provided below:
library(ensembldb)
library(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v75)
data(myPeakList)
annoData <- annoGR(EnsDb.Hsapiens.v75)
# Step1: annotate peaks to the overlapping features, if "select = 'all'", multiple features can be assigned to a single peak.
anno_overlapping <- annotatePeakInBatch(myPeakList,
AnnotationData = annoData,
output = "overlapping",
select = "first")
anno_overlapping_non_na <- anno_overlapping[!is.na(anno_overlapping$feature)]
# Step2: annotate peaks that are without overlapping features to nearest features
myPeakList_non_overlapping <- myPeakList[!(names(myPeakList) %in% anno_overlapping_non_na$peak)]
anno_nearest <- annotatePeakInBatch(myPeakList_non_overlapping,
AnnotationData = annoData,
output = "nearestLocation",
select = "first")
# Step3: concatenate the two
anno_final <- c(anno_overlapping_non_na, anno_nearest)The provided code allocates either the “overlapping” or “nearest” feature to each peak. If the “overlapping” feature is not the “nearest”, only the “overlapping” one will be reported.
15.6 Why is the sum of peak numbers in the Venn diagram NOT equal to the sum of the peaks in the original peak lists?
This question is a common scenario in calculating the intersection of peaks. Peaks, being a range of continuous points rather than single points, present a challenge in determining the overlapping regions. Consider the intersection of two lists of range objects: list A (1~3, 4~5, 7~9) and list B (2~8), the number of overlapping ranges depends on the reference chosen, if we use list B as the reference, the output would be one range; however, if we use list A as the reference, the output would be three ranges.
15.7 How does findOverlapsOfPeaks count the number of overlapping peaks?
This question is in response to this post.
When counting the number of overlapping peaks using findOverlapsOfPeaks, the connectedPeaks option comes into play. If multiple peaks involve in any group of connected or overlapping peaks in any input peak list, setting connectedPeaks = "merge" will increment the overlapping counts by one. On the other hand, setting connectedPeaks = "min" will add the minimal number of involved peaks in each group of connected or overlapped peaks to the overlapping counts. If connectedPeaks = "keepAll", it will add the number of involved peaks for each peak list to the corresponding overlapping counts. In addition, it will output counts as if connectedPeaks was set to “min”.
For examples, if 5 peaks in group1 overlap with 2 peaks in group 2:
- Setting
connectedPeaks = "merge"will add 1 to the overlapping counts - Setting
connectedPeaks = "min"will add 2 to the overlapping counts - Setting
connectedPeaks = "keepAll"will add 5 peaks to “count.group1”, 2 to “count.group2”, and 2 to the overlapping counts
15.8 Is there a way to show the number of peaks in original peak lists?
You have the option to configure connectedPeaks = "keepAll" in both the findOverlapsOfPeaks and makeVennDiagram functions.
15.9 How to extract the original peak IDs of the overlapping peaks?
In the output of findOverlapsOfPeaks, each element in the peak list contains a metadata column names peakNames, which is a CharacterList. This CharacterList is a list of the contributing peak IDs with prefixes, e.g. “peaks1_peakname1”, “peaksi_peaknamej”, where “i” denotes the peak group i and “j” denotes the specific peak j within that group. Users can retrieve the original peak name by splitting these strings. Here are the sample codes:
library(ChIPpeakAnno)
library(reshape2)
# Step1: read in two peak files
bed <- system.file("extdata",
"MACS_output.bed",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
gff <- system.file("extdata",
"GFF_peaks.gff",
package = "ChIPpeakAnno")
gr1 <- toGRanges(bed, format = "BED",
header = FALSE)
gr2 <- toGRanges(gff, format = "GFF",
header = FALSE, skip = 3)
names(gr2) <- seq(length(gr2)) # add names to gr2 for Step4
# Step2: find overlapping peaks
ol <- findOverlapsOfPeaks(gr1, gr2)
peakNames <- ol$peaklist[['gr1///gr2']]$peakNames
# Step3: extract original peak names
peakNames <- melt(peakNames,
value.name = "merged_peak_id") # reshape df
head(peakNames, n = 2)## merged_peak_id <NA> <NA>
## 1 1 1 gr1__MACS_peak_13
## 2 1 1 gr2__1peakNames <- cbind(peakNames[, 1],
do.call(rbind,
strsplit(as.character(peakNames[, 3]), "__")))
colnames(peakNames) <- c("merged_peak_id", "group", "peakName")
head(peakNames, n = 2)## merged_peak_id group peakName
## [1,] "1" "gr1" "MACS_peak_13"
## [2,] "1" "gr2" "1"# Step4: split by peak group
gr1_subset <- gr1[peakNames[peakNames[, "group"] %in% "gr1", "peakName"]]
gr2_subset <- gr2[peakNames[peakNames[, "group"] %in% "gr2", "peakName"]]
head(gr1_subset, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## MACS_peak_13 chr1 713791-715332 * | 2550.61
## MACS_peak_14 chr1 724851-727191 * | 58.34
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthshead(gr2_subset, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | source type score phase
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <factor> <factor> <numeric> <integer>
## 1 chr1 713893-714747 + | bed2gff region_0 0 <NA>
## 2 chr1 715023-715578 + | bed2gff region_1 0 <NA>
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsAlternatively, the following snippet should also work.
gr1_renamed <- ol$all.peaks$gr1
gr2_renamed <- ol$all.peaks$gr2
head(gr1_renamed, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## gr1__MACS_peak_1 chr1 28341-29610 * | 160.81
## gr1__MACS_peak_2 chr1 90821-91234 * | 133.12
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthshead(gr2_renamed, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | source type score phase
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <factor> <factor> <numeric> <integer>
## gr2__1 chr1 713893-714747 + | bed2gff region_0 0 <NA>
## gr2__2 chr1 715023-715578 + | bed2gff region_1 0 <NA>
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthspeakNames <- melt(ol$peaklist[['gr1///gr2']]$peakNames,
value.name = "merged_peak_id")
gr1_subset <- gr1_renamed[peakNames[grepl("^gr1", peakNames[, 3]), 3]]
gr2_subset <- gr2_renamed[peakNames[grepl("^gr2", peakNames[, 3]), 3]]
head(gr1_subset, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## gr1__MACS_peak_13 chr1 713791-715332 * | 2550.61
## gr1__MACS_peak_14 chr1 724851-727191 * | 58.34
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthshead(gr2_subset, n = 2)## GRanges object with 2 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | source type score phase
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <factor> <factor> <numeric> <integer>
## gr2__1 chr1 713893-714747 + | bed2gff region_0 0 <NA>
## gr2__2 chr1 715023-715578 + | bed2gff region_1 0 <NA>
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths15.10 How to select the proper number for totalTest when using makeVennDiagram?
During the evaluation of the association between two sets of peak data using the hypergeometric distribution, it is essential to determine the total number of potential binding sites, the totalTest parameter in the makeVennDiagram. This parameter should have a value larger than the largest number of peaks in the peak list. The choice of totalTest influences teh stringency of the test, with smaller values yielding more stringent tests and larger P-values. The computation time for calculating P-values remains independent of the totalTest value. For practical guidance on selecting an appropriate totalTest value, please refer to this post.
16 How to cite ChIPpeakAnno
If you use ChIPpeakAnno in your work, please cite it as follows:
## Please cite the paper below for the ChIPpeakAnno package.
##
## Lihua J Zhu, Claude Gazin, Nathan D Lawson, Herve Pages, Simon M Lin,
## David S Lapointe and Michael R Green, ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor
## package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data. BMC Bioinformatics.
## 2010, 11:237
##
## Zhu LJ. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
## Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1067:105-24.
##
## To see these entries in BibTeX format, use 'print(<citation>,
## bibtex=TRUE)', 'toBibtex(.)', or set
## 'options(citation.bibtex.max=999)'.17 Session info
Here is the output of sessionInfo() on the system on which this document was compiled running pandoc 2.7.3:
## R version 4.5.0 (2025-04-11 ucrt)
## Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64
## Running under: Windows Server 2022 x64 (build 20348)
##
## Matrix products: default
## LAPACK version 3.12.1
##
## locale:
## [1] LC_COLLATE=C
## [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.utf8
## [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.utf8
## [4] LC_NUMERIC=C
## [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.utf8
##
## time zone: America/New_York
## tzcode source: internal
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] grid stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
## [8] methods base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] reshape2_1.4.4
## [2] EnsDb.Hsapiens.v75_2.99.0
## [3] motifStack_1.53.0
## [4] BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38_1.4.5
## [5] BSgenome_1.77.0
## [6] rtracklayer_1.69.0
## [7] BiocIO_1.19.0
## [8] Biostrings_2.77.1
## [9] XVector_0.49.0
## [10] reactome.db_1.92.0
## [11] org.Hs.eg.db_3.21.0
## [12] TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg18.knownGene_3.2.2
## [13] UpSetR_1.4.0
## [14] TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene_3.21.0
## [15] AnnotationHub_3.99.5
## [16] knitr_1.50
## [17] biomaRt_2.65.0
## [18] EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86_2.99.0
## [19] ensembldb_2.33.0
## [20] AnnotationFilter_1.33.0
## [21] GenomicFeatures_1.61.3
## [22] AnnotationDbi_1.71.0
## [23] Biobase_2.69.0
## [24] ChIPpeakAnno_3.43.0
## [25] GenomicRanges_1.61.0
## [26] GenomeInfoDb_1.45.4
## [27] IRanges_2.43.0
## [28] S4Vectors_0.47.0
## [29] BiocGenerics_0.55.0
## [30] generics_0.1.4
## [31] BiocFileCache_2.99.5
## [32] dbplyr_2.5.0
## [33] BiocStyle_2.37.0
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 jsonlite_2.0.0
## [3] magrittr_2.0.3 magick_2.8.6
## [5] farver_2.1.2 rmarkdown_2.29
## [7] vctrs_0.6.5 multtest_2.65.0
## [9] Cairo_1.6-2 memoise_2.0.1
## [11] Rsamtools_2.25.0 RCurl_1.98-1.17
## [13] base64enc_0.1-3 tinytex_0.57
## [15] htmltools_0.5.8.1 S4Arrays_1.9.1
## [17] progress_1.2.3 lambda.r_1.2.4
## [19] curl_6.2.3 SparseArray_1.9.0
## [21] sass_0.4.10 bslib_0.9.0
## [23] htmlwidgets_1.6.4 plyr_1.8.9
## [25] httr2_1.1.2 futile.options_1.0.1
## [27] cachem_1.1.0 GenomicAlignments_1.45.0
## [29] lifecycle_1.0.4 pkgconfig_2.0.3
## [31] Matrix_1.7-3 R6_2.6.1
## [33] fastmap_1.2.0 MatrixGenerics_1.21.0
## [35] digest_0.6.37 TFMPvalue_0.0.9
## [37] regioneR_1.41.2 RSQLite_2.4.0
## [39] seqLogo_1.75.0 labeling_0.4.3
## [41] filelock_1.0.3 httr_1.4.7
## [43] abind_1.4-8 compiler_4.5.0
## [45] FDb.UCSC.tRNAs_1.0.1 bit64_4.6.0-1
## [47] withr_3.0.2 BiocParallel_1.43.3
## [49] DBI_1.2.3 MASS_7.3-65
## [51] rappdirs_0.3.3 DelayedArray_0.35.1
## [53] rjson_0.2.23 gtools_3.9.5
## [55] caTools_1.18.3 tools_4.5.0
## [57] glue_1.8.0 VennDiagram_1.7.3
## [59] restfulr_0.0.15 InteractionSet_1.37.0
## [61] ade4_1.7-23 TFBSTools_1.47.0
## [63] seqinr_4.2-36 gtable_0.3.6
## [65] tidyr_1.3.1 data.table_1.17.4
## [67] hms_1.1.3 xml2_1.3.8
## [69] BiocVersion_3.22.0 pillar_1.10.2
## [71] stringr_1.5.1 splines_4.5.0
## [73] dplyr_1.1.4 lattice_0.22-7
## [75] survival_3.8-3 bit_4.6.0
## [77] DirichletMultinomial_1.51.0 universalmotif_1.27.2
## [79] tidyselect_1.2.1 RBGL_1.85.0
## [81] GO.db_3.21.0 gridExtra_2.3
## [83] grImport2_0.3-3 bookdown_0.43
## [85] ProtGenerics_1.41.0 SummarizedExperiment_1.39.0
## [87] futile.logger_1.4.3 xfun_0.52
## [89] matrixStats_1.5.0 stringi_1.8.7
## [91] UCSC.utils_1.5.0 lazyeval_0.2.2
## [93] yaml_2.3.10 evaluate_1.0.3
## [95] codetools_0.2-20 tibble_3.2.1
## [97] BiocManager_1.30.25 graph_1.87.0
## [99] cli_3.6.5 jquerylib_0.1.4
## [101] dichromat_2.0-0.1 Rcpp_1.0.14
## [103] png_0.1-8 XML_3.99-0.18
## [105] parallel_4.5.0 ggplot2_3.5.2
## [107] blob_1.2.4 prettyunits_1.2.0
## [109] jpeg_0.1-11 bitops_1.0-9
## [111] pwalign_1.5.0 txdbmaker_1.5.4
## [113] scales_1.4.0 purrr_1.0.4
## [115] crayon_1.5.3 rlang_1.1.6
## [117] KEGGREST_1.49.0 formatR_1.14Adachi, N., and M. R. Lieber. 2002. “Bidirectional Gene Organization: A Common Architectural Feature of the Human Genome.” Journal Article. Cell 109 (7): 807–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00758-4.
Barski, A., S. Cuddapah, K. Cui, T. Y. Roh, D. E. Schones, Z. Wang, G. Wei, I. Chepelev, and K. Zhao. 2007. “High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome.” Journal Article. Cell 129 (4): 823–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009.
Blat, Y., and N. Kleckner. 1999. “Cohesins Bind to Preferential Sites Along Yeast Chromosome Iii, with Differential Regulation Along Arms Versus the Centric Region.” Journal Article. Cell 98 (2): 249–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81019-3.
Consortium, Encode Project. 2012. “An Integrated Encyclopedia of Dna Elements in the Human Genome.” Journal Article. Nature 489 (7414): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11247.
Durinck, Steffen, Yves Moreau, Arek Kasprzyk, Sean Davis, Bart De Moor, Alvis Brazma, and Wolfgang Huber. 2005. “BioMart and Bioconductor: A Powerful Link Between Biological Databases and Microarray Data Analysis.” Bioinformatics 21 (16): 3439–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525.
Johnson, D. S., A. Mortazavi, R. M. Myers, and B. Wold. 2007. “Genome-Wide Mapping of in Vivo Protein-Dna Interactions.” Journal Article. Science 316 (5830): 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141319.
Leung, Ming-Ying, Genevieve M Marsh, and Terence P Speed. 1996. “Over-and Underrepresentation of Short Dna Words in Herpesvirus Genomes.” Journal of Computational Biology 3 (3): 345–60.
Lieberman-Aiden, E., N. L. van Berkum, L. Williams, M. Imakaev, T. Ragoczy, A. Telling, I. Amit, et al. 2009. “Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome.” Journal Article. Science 326 (5950): 289–93. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181369.
Skene, P. J., and S. Henikoff. 2017. “An Efficient Targeted Nuclease Strategy for High-Resolution Mapping of Dna Binding Sites.” Journal Article. Elife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21856.
Thomas, R., S. Thomas, A. K. Holloway, and K. S. Pollard. 2017. “Features That Define the Best Chip-Seq Peak Calling Algorithms.” Journal Article. Brief Bioinform 18 (3): 441–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw035.
Yip, Kevin Y, Chao Cheng, Nitin Bhardwaj, James B Brown, Jing Leng, Anshul Kundaje, Joel Rozowsky, et al. 2012. “Classification of Human Genomic Regions Based on Experimentally Determined Binding Sites of More Than 100 Transcription-Related Factors.” Genome Biol 13 (9): R48.
Zhang, Y., T. Liu, C. A. Meyer, J. Eeckhoute, D. S. Johnson, B. E. Bernstein, C. Nusbaum, et al. 2008. “Model-Based Analysis of Chip-Seq (Macs).” Journal Article. Genome Biol 9 (9): R137. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.
Zhu, Lihua J, Claude Gazin, Nathan D Lawson, Hervé Pagès, Simon M Lin, David S Lapointe, and Michael R Green. 2010. “ChIPpeakAnno: A Bioconductor Package to Annotate Chip-Seq and Chip-Chip Data.” BMC Bioinformatics 11 (1): 237.
Zhu, Lihua Julie. 2013. “Integrative Analysis of Chip-Chip and Chip-Seq Dataset.” In Tiling Arrays, 105–24. Springer.